Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31020555›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2019

Whole-Genome Annotation with BRAKER.

Katharina J Hoff, Alexandre Lomsadze, Mark Borodovsky, Mario Stanke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 476 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
476citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

476 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Rapidly evolving aphid gall effector proteins exhibit saposin-like folds.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Genome analysis of the glycosphingolipid-producing green alga tetraselmis sp. NKG400013.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Telomere-to-Telomere Genome Assembly ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Telomere-to-Telomere Genome Assembly ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Draft genome sequence of the peptaibol producerMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

416 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katharina J HoffUniversity of Greifswald, Institute of Mathematics and Computer Science, Greifswald, Germany. katharina.hoff@uni-greifswald.de.
Alexandre LomsadzeJoint Georgia Tech and Emory University Wallace H Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Mark BorodovskyJoint Georgia Tech and Emory University Wallace H Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Atlanta, GA, USA. borodovsky@gatech.edu.
Mario StankeUniversity of Greifswald, Institute of Mathematics and Computer Science, Greifswald, Germany.

Funding

PREDICTION OF GENE LOCATIONS USING STOCHASTIC MODELSR01HG000783 · NHGRI · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BORODOVSKY, MARK · 1993 to 2014
$4.7M
NIGMS Administrative Supplements to Support Undergraduate Summer ResearchR01GM128145 · NIGMS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BORODOVSKY, MARK · 2018 to 2021
$1.1M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG000783NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM128145
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BRAKER is a pipeline for highly accurate and fully automated gene prediction in novel eukaryotic genomes. It combines two major tools: GeneMark-ES/ET and AUGUSTUS. GeneMark-ES/ET learns its parameters from a novel genomic sequence in a fully automated fashion; if available, it uses extrinsic evidence for model refinement. From the protein-coding genes predicted by GeneMark-ES/ET, we select a set for training AUGUSTUS, one of the most accurate gene finding tools that, in contrast to GeneMark-ES/ET, integrates extrinsic evidence already into the gene prediction step. The first published version, BRAKER1, integrated genomic footprints of unassembled RNA-Seq reads into the training as well as into the prediction steps. The pipeline has since been extended to the integration of data on mapped cross-species proteins, and to the usage of heterogeneous extrinsic evidence, both RNA-Seq and protein alignments. In this book chapter, we briefly summarize the pipeline methodology and describe how to apply BRAKER in environments characterized by various combinations of external evidence.

Indexed as

GenomeSoftwareAmino Acid SequenceGenomicsInternetMolecular Sequence AnnotationUser-Computer InterfaceAUGUSTUSBRAKERGeneMark-ES/ETGene predictionGenome annotation pipelineProtein-coding genesProtein mapping to genomeRNA-Seq reads

Identifiers

PMID31020555
PMCPMC6635606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.