ArticleFrontiers of medicine2019
Structural shifts in the intestinal microbiota of rats treated with cyclosporine A after orthotropic liver transplantation.
Article in Frontiers of medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immunosuppressant imprecision: multidirectional effects on metabolism and microbiome.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2025Review
- Application progress of early nutrition intervention in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Review
- Kidney transplantation and gut microbiota.Clinical kidney journal · 2024Review
- Update on the reciprocal interference between immunosuppressive therapy and gut microbiota after kidney transplantation.World journal of transplantation · 2024Review
- Review
- Gut Microbiome in Patients after Heart Transplantation-Current State of Knowledge.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Current evidence and clinical relevance of drug-microbiota interactions in inflammatory bowel disease.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Review
- Pharmacomicrobiomics in Pediatric Oncology: The Complex Interplay between Commonly Used Drugs and Gut Microbiome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- The role of gut microbiota in liver regeneration.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- Influence of the microbiome on solid organ transplant survival.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2021Review
- Effects of Gut Metabolites and Microbiota in Healthy and Marginal Livers Submitted to Surgery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Review
- Protecting Intestinal Microenvironment Alleviates Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease.Frontiers in physiology · 2020Article
- Impact of the microbiota on solid organ transplant rejection.Current opinion in organ transplantation · 2019Review
- Molecular Diagnostic Advances in Transplant Infectious Diseases.Current infectious disease reports · 2019Review
- Gut Microbiota and Liver Regeneration: A Synthesis of Evidence on Structural Changes and Physiological Mechanisms.Journal of clinical and experimental hepatologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding the effect of immunosuppressive agents on intestinal microbiota is important to reduce the mortality and morbidity from orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). We investigated the relationship between the commonly used immunosuppressive agent cyclosporine A (CSA) and the intestinal microbial variation in an OLT model. The rat samples were divided as follows: (1) N group (normal control); (2) I group (isograft LT, Brown Norway [BN] rat to BN); (3) R group (allograft LT, Lewis to BN rat); and (4) CSA group (R group treated with CSA). The intestinal microbiota was assayed by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis profiles and by using real-time polymerase chain reaction. The liver histopathology and the alanine/aspartate aminotransferase ratio after LT were both ameliorated by CSA. In the CSA group, the numbers of rDNA gene copies of Clostridium cluster I, Clostridium cluster XIV, and Enterobacteriaceae decreased, whereas those of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii increased compared with the R group. Cluster analysis indicated that the samples from the N, I, and CSA groups were clustered, whereas the other clusters contained the samples from the R group. Hence, CSA ameliorates hepatic graft injury and partially restores gut microbiota following LT, and these may benefit hepatic graft rejection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31020543What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.