Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31020506›Full record

ReviewPituitary2019

Traumatic brain injury and resultant pituitary dysfunction: insights from experimental animal models.

Annelies Vennekens, Hugo Vankelecom

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pituitary, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Annelies VennekensDepartment of Development and Regeneration, Cluster of Stem Cell and Developmental Biology, Unit of Stem Cell Research, KU Leuven (University of Leuven), Campus Gasthuisberg O&N4, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6278-251X
Hugo VankelecomDepartment of Development and Regeneration, Cluster of Stem Cell and Developmental Biology, Unit of Stem Cell Research, KU Leuven (University of Leuven), Campus Gasthuisberg O&N4, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. hugo.vankelecom@kuleuven.be.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2251-7284
KU Leuven · BE

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 11W9217N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTraumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major worldwide cause of disability, often burdening young people with serious lifelong health problems. A frequent clinical complication is post-traumatic hypopituitarism (PTHP) manifesting in several hypothalamus-pituitary axes. The head trauma-induced mechanisms underlying PTHP remain largely unknown. Several hypotheses have been proposed including direct damage to the pituitary gland and hypothalamus, vascular events and autoimmunity. This review aims to provide a summary of the currently limited number of studies exploring hypothalamus-pituitary dysfunction in experimental animal TBI models.

resultsAlthough the impact of different forms of TBI on a number of hypothalamus-pituitary axes has been investigated, consequences for pituitary tissue and function have only scarcely been described. Moreover, mechanisms underlying the endocrine dysfunctions remain under explored.

conclusionsStudies on TBI-induced pituitary dysfunction are still scarce. More research is needed to acquire mechanistic insights into the pathophysiology of PTHP which may eventually open up the horizon toward better treatments, including pituitary-regenerative approaches.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain Injuries, TraumaticHumansHypopituitarismModels, AnimalPituitary DiseasesPituitary GlandHypopituitarismPituitaryPituitary dysfunctionRegenerationStem cellsTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID31020506
OpenAlexW2940992406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.