Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31020453›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2019

Psychosocial Factors and Recovery After Acute Myocardial Infarction in Younger Women.

Kim G Smolderen, Anna Brush, Rachel P Dreyer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kim G SmolderenSaint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, 4401 Wornall Rd, Kansas City, MO, 64111, USA. smolderenk@umkc.edu.
Anna BrushUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Rachel P DreyerCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), New Haven, CT, USA.
Saint Luke's Hospital · USUniversity of Virginia · USYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewTo explain sex and gender approaches to studying acute myocardial infarction (AMI) risk and outcomes in younger women (18-55 years). More specifically, by looking at the AMI care pathway-from AMI risk to receiving acute and follow-up outpatient care to longer term AMI outcomes-we will examine where potential psychosocial factors may be associated with inequalities in AMI care and outcomes in younger women. RECENT

findingsDespite recent declines in AMI incidence, morbidity, and mortality rates, younger women stand out as a group whose incidence has risen and who face worse outcomes following AMI, as compared with other groups. A focus on gender, rather than the binary, biological sex construct, allowed researchers to better understand potential pathways as to why younger women are facing this risk. Feminine traits and disproportionate exposures to psychosocial stressors in society at large may be correlated with inequalities in AMI care and further AMI outcomes in younger women. Psychosocial interventions in women with AMI that have proven to be successful have embraced this wider gender concept. Adopting a wider gender-concept to understand roles and demands that are placed on individuals that make them more at risk to experience psychosocial stressors and make it more challenging to organize self-care, get access to care, and equitable care may be needed.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultFemaleHumansIncidenceMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionPsychologyRisk FactorsSex FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsYoung AdultAcute myocardial infarctionGenderPsychosocial factorsSexYounger women

Identifiers

PMID31020453
OpenAlexW2941986922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.