ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2021
Different approaches towards geriatric trauma care for hip fracture patients: an inter-hospital comparison.
Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Do we understand each other when we develop and implement hip fracture models of care? A systematic review with narrative synthesis.BMJ open quality · 2023Pooled it
- Evaluation of Systemwide Improvement Programs to Optimize Time to Surgery for Patients With Hip Fractures: A Systematic Review.JAMA network open · 2022Pooled it
- Association of orthogeriatric care models with evaluation and treatment of osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2020Pooled it
- Trial
- Geriatric Models of Surgical Care: A Scoping Review.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Time Is Bone: Missed Opportunities for Secondary Prevention After a Hip Fracture.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Efficacy of two integrated geriatric care pathways for the treatment of hip fractures: a cross-cultural comparison.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022Article
- The Quality of Life, Patient Satisfaction and Rehabilitation in Patients With a Low Energy Fracture-Part III of an Observational Study.Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeHip fractures in geriatric patients have high morbidity and mortality rates. The implementation of a multidisciplinary geriatric care pathway (GCP) may improve treatment for this patient population. This study focusses on two level II hospitals with a different treatment protocols. A comparison was made between a multidisciplinary GCP and extensive standard care with a focus on geriatric hip fracture patients to assess if a multidisciplinary GCP leads to lower mortality and morbidity.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study included patients aged 70 years or older with a unilateral proximal hip fracture who underwent surgery between January 2014 and December 2015. The primary outcome measures complications and 30-day mortality. Secondary outcome measures were time to surgery, hospital length of stay (HLOS) and secondary surgical interventions.
resultsThis study included a total of 898 patients. No differences were found between major postoperative complications, 30-day mortality, HLOS or the amount of secondary surgical interventions.
conclusionsMortality, major complications, HLOS and the amount of secondary surgical interventions showed no differences between both hospitals. This inter-hospital comparison of two types of geriatric care models showed no outcome that favours one specific geriatric care model over another. This provides opportunities for future studies to get a better understanding of what specific factors of geriatric care models contribute most to an improvement in the treatment of this patient population and decide which approach is most cost effective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31020360What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.