ReviewDer Unfallchirurg2019
[Management of pre-existing anticoagulation for timely treatment of proximal femoral fractures].
Review in Der Unfallchirurg, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Treatment of proximal femoral fractures : Principles, tips and tricks].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Review
- [Long-term anticoagulation treatment in proximal femoral fractures as obstacle to surgery in the 24h time window? : Results of an analysis of Quality Assurance data on 32,252 treatment courses with osteosynthesis].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Anticoagulation management in elderly patients with proximal femur fractures - overview of current concepts.Innovative surgical sciences · 2023Review
- Proximal Femoral Fractures in the Elderly: A Few Things to Know, and Some to Forget.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Review
- Management of proximal femur fractures in the elderly: current concepts and treatment options.European journal of medical research · 2021Review
- Article
- [Injury of the profunda femoris artery with bleeding requiring transfusion due to secondary dislocation of the lesser trochanter after osteosynthesis of an intertrochanteric femoral fracture].Der Unfallchirurg · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Proximal femoral fractures are urgent indications for surgery. In cases of delayed surgical treatment more than 48 h after hospital admittance, increased rates of general complications, local complications and mortality have been proven. Since 2015, the quality target for the external quality assurance by order of the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) is surgical treatment within 24 h after hospital admittance for osteosynthesis and within 48 h for joint replacement. The foundations for these time intervals are the S2e guidelines for the treatment of femoral neck fractures of adults from the German Society of Trauma Surgery (DGU) and the Austrian Society of Trauma Surgery (ÖGU) and several other international guidelines. The distinction of the temporal specifications between osteosynthesis and joint replacement in Germany is unusual in comparison with other countries. For 15% of each group of patients a prolonged preoperative preparation is accepted. In the structured dialog within the external quality management anticoagulants are quoted as the most frequent reason for delayed surgery. The present review provides a way to achieve compliance with statutory provisions, to minimize the risks of both bleeding and thromboembolism and to achieve surgical treatment of proximal femoral fractures within the agreed time limit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.