Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31020344›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2019

Resting fMRI as an alternative for task-based fMRI for language lateralization in temporal lobe epilepsy patients: a study using independent component analysis.

K A Smitha, K M Arun, P G Rajesh, Bejoy Thomas, Ashalatha Radhakrishnan, P Sankara Sarma, C Kesavadas

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Rest-fMRI-A Potential Substitute for Task-fMRI?The Indian journal of radiology & imaging · 2024
    Article
  3. White Matter Function and Network Abnormalities in Patients with Diabetic Retinopathy.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

K A SmithaDepartment of Imaging Sciences and Interventional Radiology, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum, Kerala, 695011, India.
K M ArunDepartment of Imaging Sciences and Interventional Radiology, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum, Kerala, 695011, India.
P G RajeshDepartment of Neurology, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum, Kerala, 695011, India.
Bejoy ThomasDepartment of Imaging Sciences and Interventional Radiology, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum, Kerala, 695011, India.
Ashalatha RadhakrishnanDepartment of Neurology, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum, Kerala, 695011, India.
P Sankara SarmaAchutha Menon Centre for Health Science Studies, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Science and Technology, Trivandrum, Kerala, 695011, India.
C KesavadasDepartment of Imaging Sciences and Interventional Radiology, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum, Kerala, 695011, India. chandkesav@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4914-8666

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOur aim is to investigate whether rs-fMRI can be used as an effective technique to study language lateralization. We aim to find out the most appropriate language network among different networks identified using ICA.

methodsFifteen healthy right-handed subjects, sixteen left, and sixteen right temporal lobe epilepsy patients prospectively underwent MR scanning in 3T MRI (GE Discovery™ MR750w), using optimized imaging protocol. We obtained task-fMRI data using a visual-verb generation paradigm. Rs-fMRI and language-fMRI analysis were conducted using FSL software. Independent component analysis (ICA) was used to estimate rs-fMRI networks. Dice coefficient was calculated to examine the similarity in activated voxels of a common language template and the rs-fMRI language networks. Laterality index (LI) was calculated from the task-based language activation and rs-fMRI language network, for a range of LI thresholds at different z scores.

resultsMeasurement of hemispheric language dominance with rs-fMRI was highly concordant with task-fMRI results. Among the evaluated z scores for a range of LI thresholds, rs-fMRI yielded a maximum accuracy of 95%, a sensitivity of 83%, and specificity of 92.8% for z = 2 at 0.05 LI threshold.

conclusionThe present study suggests that rs-fMRI networks obtained using ICA technique can be used as an alternative for task-fMRI language laterality. The novel aspect of the work is suggestive of optimal thresholds while applying rs-fMRI, is an important endeavor given that many patients with epilepsy have co-morbid cognitive deficits. Thus, an accurate method to determine language laterality without requiring a patient to complete the language task would be advantageous.

Indexed as

LanguageCase-Control StudiesEpilepsy, Temporal LobeFemaleFunctional LateralityHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityIndependent component analysisLanguage-fMRILanguage lateralizationResting fMRITemporal lobe epilepsy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.