ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2017
Mechanical circulatory support for refractory cardiogenic shock in Takotsubo syndrome: a case report and review of the literature.
Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trends and outcomes of different mechanical circulatory support modalities for refractory cardiogenic shock in Takotsubo cardiomyopathy.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2025Article
- Mechanical Circulatory Support Strategies in Takotsubo Syndrome with Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Missing Links in the Incidence of Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy in Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage!Neurocritical care · 2023Article
- Cardiogenic shock as the initial manifestation of takotsubo syndrome.Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico · 2022Article
- Successful Coil Embolization Using Percutaneous Cardiopulmonary Support in a Patient with Refractory Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest Caused by Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.NMC case report journal · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) complicated by refractory cardiogenic shock is a challenging clinical problem, as treatment with inotropic agents and/or vasopressors is contraindicated. We illustrate this by a patient presenting with chest pain and shortness of breath caused by TTS complicated by cardiogenic shock requiring mechanical circulatory support (MCS). The patient received central extracorporeal life support with a cannula in the left atrium (pre-load reduction of left ventricle) and the return cannula in the ascending aorta (neutral on afterload). Treatment with MCS was complicated by a cardiac tamponade. Left ventricular function recovered after 24 h, and the patient was doing well at the outpatient clinic 7 weeks after discharge. In addition, we reviewed the literature (PubMed search) reporting on MCS in patients with TTS. Including our patient, 17 cases of TTS induced cardiogenic shock receiving MCS have been reported. Age of the patients ranged from 16 years to 74 years, and 71% of the patients were female. Extracorporeal life support was the most used type of MCS (82% of the cases). Two patients died, and complications of MCS were rare (one case of leg ischaemia). Theoretically, MCS devices that reduce pre-load and are neutral on afterload are preferable. However, no specific type of MCS can be recommended as randomized trials are lacking. In conclusion, our case and the available literature suggests that MCS in TTS induced refractory cardiogenic shock is an immediate and feasible lifesaving treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.