Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31019954›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2019

Which induction chemotherapy regimen followed by cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the best choice among PF, TP and TPF for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma?

Yan He, Tao Guo, Jingjing Wang, Yu Sun, Hui Guan, Shaoyong Wu, Xingchen Peng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus cisplatin induction chemotherapy in patients with locoregionally advanced NPC.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yan HeDepartment of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Tao GuoDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, West China Second Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Jingjing WangDepartment of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Yu SunDepartment of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Hui GuanDepartment of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Shaoyong WuDepartment of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Xingchen PengDepartment of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhich induction chemotherapy (IC) regimen followed by cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the best choice among PF (cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil), TP (docetaxel and cisplatin) and TPF (docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil) remains controversial in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC). This Bayesian network meta-analysis investigated the efficacy and toxicity of these three common IC regimens and attempted to find the optimal chemotherapy regimen.

methodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to December, 2017. Then, we screened studies for eligibility, extracted data, assessed their quality, tested consistency, and used Bayesian network meta-analysis to combine direct and indirect evidence.

resultsTen records were identified involving 7 eligible RCTs with 1,570 patients. Results of the Bayesian network meta-analysis shows that TPF [hazard ratios (HRs) 0.68; 95% credibility interval (CrI), 0.42-1.1], TP (HRs 0.70; 95% CrI, 0.22-2.2) and PF (HRs 1.0; 95% CrI, 0.71-1.5) have the probability of 49.61%, 47.45% and 1.57% respectively to be the optimal induction regimen. Docetaxel-based regimens, including TP [risk ratios (RRs) 5.9; 95% CrI, 1.4-26.0) and TPF (RRs 4.5; 95% CrI, 1.1-18.0), significantly increase the incidence of hematological toxicity. As for ≥ grade 3 mucositis, 5-fluorouracil-based regimens, including PF (RRs 2.1; 95% CrI, 0.91-5.8) and TPF (RRs 1.4; 95% CrI, 0.48-4. 6), are higher than TP (RRs 1.1; 95% CrI, 0.30-4.6).

conclusionsOnly considering overall survival (OS), TPF has the highest probability to be the optimal choice in LA-NPC and TP also shows encouraging anti-tumor effects. However, we also noticed that TPF induced worse adverse events, especially in ≥ grade 3 hematological toxicity and oral mucositis.

Indexed as

chemoradiotherapyinduction chemotherapy regimen (IC regimen)Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC)network meta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID31019954
PMCPMC6462656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.