ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2019
Association between different sequences of vessel ligation during video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy and survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effects of Vessel Interruption Sequence During Lobectomy for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2021Pooled it
- Article
- Vein-firstJournal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
- Circulating Tumor Cells and the Non-Touch Isolation Technique in Surgery for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.Cancers · 2022Review
- Vein-first versus artery-first ligation procedure for lung cancer surgery: An updated review.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2021Review
- Wedge Resection of Tumor Before Lobectomy for Lung Cancer Could Be a No-touch Isolation Technique.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
- Vein-first Lobectomy for Lung Cancer Assessed According to the Status of Clustered Circulating Tumour Cells.Cancer diagnosis & prognosisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this retrospective study was to assess the influence of the sequence of pulmonary vessel ligation during video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy on long-term survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
methodsThis retrospective study included 60 patients treated surgically with lobectomy and standard lymphadenectomy between 2012 and 2013. Patients had primary ligation of the pulmonary vein or veins (PV group, 33 patients) or of the pulmonary artery or arteries (PA group, 27 patients). Patients were excluded if they had undergone pulmonary wedge resection before lobectomy. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were also used to investigate the effect of clinical characteristics of interest on survival.
resultsMedian follow-up was 54.5 months. Baseline characteristics of the two groups were statistically comparable regarding gender, histology, type of resection, T stage, and overall stage (all P>0.05). Overall, 5-year survival reached 66.67% in the PV group and 44.44% in the PA group (P=0.084). There were no differences between two groups regarding overall survival (OS) (P=0.063, HR: 2.093; 95% CI: 0.960-4.564), disease-free survival (DFS) (P=0.180, HR: 1.539; 95% CI: 0.820-2.889), or cancer-specific deaths (P=0.227, 14/33
conclusionsIn summary, the sequence of pulmonary vessel ligation during video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for NSCLC has no different effects on long-term survival, but for patients with squamous cell carcinoma, venous ligation should be preferred first since it may bring survival advantage after surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.