Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31019728›Full record

ArticleObesity science & practice2019

Outcomes of an RCT of videoconference vs. in-person or in-clinic nutrition and exercise in midlife adults with obesity.

D O Clark, N Keith, M Weiner, H Xu

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity science & practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05425797 (Building on Existing Tools To Improve Chronic Disease Prevention and Screening in Primary Care Virtually), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05425797 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Building on Existing Tools To Improve Chronic Disease Prevention and Screening in Primary Care Virtually: the Virtual BETTER Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorMemorial University of NewfoundlandRan2023 to 2024Enrolled92ConditionsDelivery Modality of BETTER InterventionArmsIn-Person Prevention Practitioner Visit, Video-Call Prevention Practitioner Visit, Phone Prevention Practitioner Visit
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Digital versus nondigital behavioral interventions on cardiovascular risk reduction: systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. The past, present, and future of behavioral obesity treatment.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Can you see me? Participant experience of accessing a weight management programme via group videoconference to overcome barriers to engagement.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

D O ClarkIndiana University Center for Aging Research Indianapolis IN USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5399-8263
N KeithIndiana University Center for Aging Research Indianapolis IN USA.
M WeinerWilliam M. Tierney Center for Health Services Research Indiana University School of Medicine, Regenstrief Institute, Inc. Indianapolis IN USA.
H XuDepartment of Biostatistics Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis IN USA.

Funding

RCT of Video-Conference & In-Person Weight Loss Services for Adult CHC PatientsR01DK092377 · NIDDK · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI CLARK, DANIEL O · 2012 to 2015
$1.9M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK092377
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveNew communication technologies have shown some promise in lifestyle weight loss interventions but may be most effective when leveraging face-to-face communications. The study reported here sought to test whether weight loss programme attendance and outcomes are greater when offered in-person at community sites or remotely via videoconference vs. in Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs). In a three-arm randomized trial among 150 FQHC adults, intervention delivery in community-sites or via videoconference was tested against a clinic-based lifestyle intervention (enhanced usual care [EUC]).

methodsTwice weekly, a nutrition topic was reviewed, and exercise sessions were held in a 20-week programme delivered either in community settings or via videoconference. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants losing more than 2 kg at 6 (end of treatment) and 12 months in intent-to-treat analyses.

resultsMean (SD) age was 53 years, 82% were women, 65% were African-American, 50% reported $18,000 or less household income and 49% tested low in health literacy, and mean (SD) body mass index was 39 kg m

conclusionVideoconference and community-based delivery were as effective as an FQHC-based weight loss programme.

Indexed as

Adultsobesityweight loss

Identifiers

PMID31019728
PMCPMC6469332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.