Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31019705›Full record

Observational studyUnited European gastroenterology journal2019

Combined excision and ablation of ampullary tumors with biliary or pancreatic intraductal extension is effective even in malignant neoplasms.

Enrique Pérez-Cuadrado-Robles, Hubert Piessevaux, Tom G Moreels, Ralph Yeung, Tarik Aouattah, Mina Komuta, Hélène Dano, Anne Jouret-Mourin, Pierre H Deprez

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in United European gastroenterology journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Updates on the Management of Ampullary Neoplastic Lesions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Enrique Pérez-Cuadrado-RoblesDepartment of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Hubert PiessevauxDepartment of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Tom G MoreelsDepartment of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Ralph YeungDepartment of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Tarik AouattahDepartment of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Mina KomutaDepartment of Pathology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Hélène DanoDepartment of Pathology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Anne Jouret-MourinDepartment of Pathology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Pierre H DeprezDepartment of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The feasibility and outcome of endoscopic resection in ampullary tumors with intraductal growth remains unclear. Objective: To assess the safety, feasibility and outcomes of these patients treated by thermal ablation. Methods: Retrospective observational study. All consecutive patients who underwent an endoscopic snare papillectomy with a 6-month minimum follow-up were included. Ablation was performed with cystotomes and soft/forced coagulation. Successful endoscopic treatment was defined as no adenomatous residual tissue or recurrence observed at follow-up. Results: Of 86 patients presenting with an ampullary tumor, 73 (58 ± 14 years old, 49% men, 34% familial adenomatous polyposis) (median tumor size: 20 mm, range: 8-80) were included. En bloc and curative resection rates were achieved in 46.6% and 83.6%, respectively.Intraductal ingrowth was seen in 18 (24.7%) patients and histologically confirmed in 12 (16.4%). Intraductal ablation achieved a 100% success rate, with a 20-month median follow-up. Most of these patients had malignant forms ( Conclusions: Intraductal ablation achieves a high therapeutic success rate in ampullary tumors with ≤20 mm ductal extension, even in malignant forms or biliary and pancreatic involvement. The technique is feasible, cheap and safe and may avoid major surgery.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAmpulla of VaterCommon Bile Duct NeoplasmsCystotomyElectrocoagulationFeasibility StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPancreatic Intraductal NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesSphincterotomy, EndoscopicAmpullary tumorampullectomycystotomeERCPpapillectomythermal ablation

Identifiers

PMID31019705
PMCPMC6466754
OpenAlexW2908967974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.