Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31019680›Full record

ArticleHealth information science and systems2019

Wavelet based deep learning approach for epilepsy detection.

Rohan Akut

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health information science and systems, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. One hundred years of neurosciences in the arts and humanities, a bibliometric review.Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Epileptic Seizures Detection Using Deep Learning Techniques: A Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Rohan AkutDepartment of Electronics and Telecommunication, MITCOE, Pune, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electroencephalogram (EEG) signal contains vital details regarding electrical actions performed by the brain. Analysis of these signals is important for epilepsy detection. However, analysis of these signals can be tricky in nature and requires human expertise. The human factor can result in subjective and possible erroneous epilepsy detection. To tackle this problem, Machine Learning (ML) algorithms were introduced, to remove the human factor. However, this approach is counterintuitive in nature as it involves using complex features for epilepsy detection. Hence to tackle this problem we have introduced a wavelet based deep learning approach which eliminates the need of feature extraction and also performs significantly better on smaller datasets compared to the present state of the art ML algorithms. To test the robustness of our model we have performed a binary (2-way) and ternary (3-way) classification using our model. It is found that the model is much more accurate than the present state of the art models and since it uses deep learning it also eliminates the need of feature extraction.

Indexed as

Convolutional neural network (CNN)Discrete wavelet transform (DWT)Electroencephalogram (EEG)Epilepsy detectionMulti class classification

Identifiers

PMID31019680
PMCPMC6453988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.