ArticleEnvironmental evidence2017
Response of chlorophyll
Article in Environmental evidence, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Structure, Diversity, and Metabolic Potential of Bacterioplankton in an Urban River at a Long Low-Level Water Period.Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation · 2026Article
- Enhancing reservoir water quality simulation through machine learning-driven remote sensing integration with EFDC: a coupled framework for eutrophication management in data-scarce regions.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Web-based ecological evidence entry form enables consistent, accessible extraction and visualization for synthesis applications.Conservation science and practice · 2025Article
- Lake chlorophyll-a linked to upstream nutrients across the CONUS.Environmental science & technology letters · 2024Article
- Relationship between chlorophyll-a, rainfall, and climate phenomena in tropical archipelagic estuarine waters.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Nutrient Explorer: An analytical framework to visualize and investigate drivers of surface water quality.Environmental modelling & software : with environment data news · 2023Article
- What is the carbon footprint of reverse osmosis in water treatment plants? A systematic review protocol.Environmental evidence · 2023Review
- Ecosystem-level effects of re-oligotrophication and N:P imbalances in rivers and estuaries on a global scale.Global change biology · 2023Review
- Geographic Analysis of the Vulnerability of U.S. Lakes to Cyanobacterial Blooms under Future Climate.Earth interactions · 2023Article
- Article
- Long-Term Mississippi River Trends Expose Shifts in the River Load Response to Watershed Nutrient Balances Between 1975 and 2017.Water resources research · 2021Article
- Detecting Climate Driven Changes in Chlorophyll-a Using High Frequency Monitoring: The Impact of the 2019 European Heatwave in Three Contrasting Aquatic Systems.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Water quality assessment of a neotropical pampean lowland stream using a phytoplankton functional trait approach.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2019Article
- MEASURING LOTIC ECOSYSTEM RESPONSES TO NUTRIENTS: A Mismatch that Limits the Synthesis and Application of Experimental Studies to Management.Limnology and oceanography bulletin · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEutrophication of freshwater ecosystems resulting from nitrogen and phosphorus pollution is a major stressor across the globe. Despite recognition by scientists and stakeholders of the problems of nutrient pollution, rigorous synthesis of scientific evidence is still needed to inform nutrient-related management decisions, especially in streams and rivers. Nutrient stressor-response relationships are complicated by multiple interacting environmental factors, complex and indirect causal pathways involving diverse biotic assemblages and food web compartments, legacy (historic) nutrient sources such as agricultural sediments, and the naturally high spatiotemporal variabilityof lotic ecosystems. Determining nutrient levels at which ecosystems are affected is a critical first step for identifying, managing, and restoring aquatic resources impaired by eutrophication and maintaining currently unimpaired resources. The systematic review outlined in this protocol will compile and synthesize literature on the response of chlorophyll
methodsSearches for published and unpublished articles (peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed) will be conducted using bibliographic databases and search engines. Searches will be supplemented with bibliography searches and requests for material from the scientific and management community. Articles will be screened for relevance at the title/abstract and full text levels using pre-determined inclusion criteria; 10% (minimum 50, maximum 200) of screened papers will be examined by multiple reviewers to ensure consistent application of criteria. Study risk of bias will be evaluated using a questionnaire developed from existing frameworks and tailored to the specific study types this review will encounter. Results will be synthesized using meta-analysis of correlation coefficients, as well as narrative and tabular summaries, and will focus on the shape, direction, strength, and variability of available nutrient-chlorophyll relationships. Sensitivity analysis and meta-regression will be used to evaluate potential effects of study quality and modifying factors on nutrient-chlorophyll relationships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.