Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31019606›Full record

ArticlePolish journal of radiology2019

Evaluation of vertebral bone mineral density in scoliosis by using quantitative computed tomography.

Orkun Sarioglu, Sinem Gezer, Fatme Ceren Sarioglu, Nevin Koremezli, Tolga Kara, Omer Akcali, Dinc Ozaksoy, Ali Balci

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polish journal of radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Orkun SariogluDepartment of Radiology, Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine, Turkey.
Sinem GezerDepartment of Radiology, Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine, Turkey.
Fatme Ceren SariogluDepartment of Radiology, Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine, Turkey.
Nevin KoremezliDepartment of Radiology, Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine, Turkey.
Tolga KaraDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine, Turkey.
Omer AkcaliDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine, Turkey.
Dinc OzaksoyDepartment of Radiology, Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine, Turkey.
Ali BalciDepartment of Radiology, Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeScoliosis is described as a lateral curvature of the spine. We aimed to evaluate bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with scoliosis by using quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and compare the BMD of idiopathic and congenital scoliosis patients. MATERIAL AND

methodsForty-three patients aged 1 to 40 years with idiopathic, congenital, or neuromuscular scoliosis and 41 matched controls of the same sex and approximate age were included in the study. Measurements of BMD were performed by QCT analysis for each vertebral body from T12 to L5, and mean BMD was calculated for each case.

resultsTwenty-two of the patients with scoliosis were idiopathic, 15 were congenital, four were neuromuscular, and two were neurofibromatosis. The mean BMD values of patients with scoliosis were significantly lower compared with the control group (106.8 ± 33.4 mg/cm

conclusionsThis study illustrated that the vertebral body BMD values of the patients with scoliosis were significantly lower than those seen in the control group.

Indexed as

osteoporosisquantitative CTscoliosis

Identifiers

PMID31019606
PMCPMC6479145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.