ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2019
Response of Mouse Visual Cortical Neurons to Electric Stimulation of the Retina.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimizing electrical stimulation parameters to enhance visual cortex activation in retina degeneration rats.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Bi-directional electrical recording and stimulation of the intact retina with a screen-printed soft probe: a feasibility study.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Layer-dependent stability of intracortical recordings and neuronal cell loss.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Implications of Neural Plasticity in Retinal Prosthesis.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2022Article
- Offset Responses in the Auditory Cortex Show Unique History Dependence.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022Article
- Transcranial ultrasound neuromodulation induces neuronal correlation change in the rat somatosensory cortex.Journal of neural engineering · 2022Article
- More than the end: OFF response plasticity as a mnemonic signature of a sound's behavioral salience.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2022Review
- Compositional and morphological properties of platinum-iridium electrodeposited on carbon fiber microelectrodes.Journal of neural engineering · 2021Article
- Transcranial Focused Ultrasound for Noninvasive Neuromodulation of the Visual Cortex.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2021Article
- Spatially confined responses of mouse visual cortex to intracortical magnetic stimulation from micro-coils.Journal of neural engineering · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Retinal prostheses strive to restore vision to the blind by electrically stimulating the neurons that survive the disease process. Clinical effectiveness has been limited however, and much ongoing effort is devoted toward the development of improved stimulation strategies, especially ones that better replicate physiological patterns of neural signaling. Here, to better understand the potential effectiveness of different stimulation strategies, we explore the responses of neurons in the primary visual cortex to electric stimulation of the retina. A 16-channel implantable microprobe was used to record single unit activities
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.