Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31019384›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA2019

Using information literacy to teach medical entrepreneurship and health care economics.

Alexander J Carroll, Shelby J Hallman, Kelly A Umstead, James McCall, Andrew J DiMeo

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Biomedical Engineering Professional Skills Development: The RADxIEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  5. Disciplinary-based information literacy skills among medical students.Journal of education and health promotion · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander J CarrollLead Librarian for Research Engagement, NC State University Libraries, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, ajcarro4@ncsu.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0248-3811
Shelby J HallmanResearch Librarian for Engineering and Entrepreneurship, Libraries, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, sjhallma@ncsu.edu.
Kelly A UmsteadAssistant Professor and Director of Graduate Programs, Department of Industrial Design, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, kaumstead@ncsu.edu.
James McCallDoctoral Student, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Joint University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, jvmccall@ncsu.edu.
Andrew J DiMeoInnovation and Design Coach, Trig, Chapel Hill, NC, ajdimeo@gmail.com.
North Carolina State University · USCarolina Headache Institute · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEntrepreneurship and innovative product design in health care requires expertise in finding and evaluating diverse types of information from a multitude of sources to accomplish a number of tasks, such as securing regulatory approval, developing a reimbursement strategy, and navigating intellectual property. The authors sought to determine whether an intensive, specialized information literacy training program that introduced undergraduate biomedical engineering students to these concepts would improve the quality of the students' design projects. We also sought to test whether information literacy training that included active learning exercises would offer increased benefits over training delivered via lectures and if this specialized information literacy training would increase the extent of students' information use.

methodsA three-arm cohort study was conducted with a control group and two experimental groups. Mixed methods assessment, including a rubric and citation analysis, was used to evaluate program outcomes by examining authentic artifacts of student learning.

resultsStudent design teams that received information literacy training on topics related to medical entrepreneurship and health care economics showed significantly improved performance on aspects of project performance relevant to health care economics over student design teams that did not receive this training. There were no significant differences between teams that engaged in active learning exercises and those that only received training via lectures. Also, there were no significant differences in citation patterns between student teams that did or did not receive specialized information literacy training.

conclusionsInformation literacy training can be used as a method for introducing undergraduate health sciences students to the health care economics aspects of the medical entrepreneurship life cycle, including the US Food and Drug Administration regulatory environment, intellectual property, and medical billing and reimbursement structures.

Indexed as

Economics, MedicalEntrepreneurshipInformation LiteracyBiomedical EngineeringHumansInformation Seeking BehaviorProgram EvaluationTeaching

Identifiers

PMID31019384
PMCPMC6466497
OpenAlexW2939047771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.