Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31018950›Full record

ArticleCancer genomics & proteomics

Opposite Prognostic Impact of Single PTEN-loss and

Georgios Lazaridis, Vassiliki Kotoula, Eleni Vrettou, Ioannis Kostopoulos, Kyriaki Manousou, Kyriaki Papadopoulou, Eleni Giannoulatou, Mattheos Bobos, Maria Sotiropoulou, George Pentheroudakis and 10 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer genomics & proteomics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Loss of PTEN Expression, PIK3CA Mutations, and Breast Cancer Survival in the Nurses' Health Studies.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Georgios LazaridisDepartment of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine Papageorgiou Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Health Sciences, Thessaloniki, Greece georlaz@yahoo.gr.
Vassiliki KotoulaDepartment of Pathology, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Eleni VrettouDepartment of Pathology, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Ioannis KostopoulosDepartment of Pathology, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Kyriaki ManousouSection of Biostatistics, Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group, Data Office, Athens, Greece.
Kyriaki PapadopoulouLaboratory of Molecular Oncology, Hellenic Foundation for Cancer Research, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Eleni GiannoulatouVictor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.
Mattheos BobosLaboratory of Molecular Oncology, Hellenic Foundation for Cancer Research, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Maria SotiropoulouDepartment of Pathology, Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece.
George PentheroudakisDepartment of Medical Oncology, Ioannina University Hospital, Ioannina, Greece.
Ioannis EfstratiouDepartment of Pathology, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Alexandra Papoudou-BaiDepartment of Pathology, Ioannina University Hospital, Ioannina, Greece.
Amanda PsyrriDivision of Oncology, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Christos ChristodoulouSecond Department of Medical Oncology, Metropolitan Hospital, Piraeus, Greece.
Helen GogasFirst Department of Medicine, Laiko General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece.
Angelos KoutrasDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University Hospital, University of Patras Medical School, Patras, Greece.
Eleni TimotheadouDepartment of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine Papageorgiou Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Health Sciences, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Dimitrios PectasidesOncology Section, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Hippokration Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Flora ZagouriDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece.
George FountzilasLaboratory of Molecular Oncology, Hellenic Foundation for Cancer Research, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki · GRNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRUniversity Hospital of Ioannina · GRAlexandra Hospital · GRHellenic Cooperative Oncology Group · GRHippocration General Hospital · GRMetropolitan Hospital · GRUniversity General Hospital Attikon · GRUniversity of Patras · GRVictor Chang Cardiac Research Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimPTEN-loss and PIK3CA mutations have been addressed as markers of PI3K activation in breast cancer. We evaluated these markers in early high-risk breast cancer (EBC) focusing on PTEN immunohistochemistry (IHC) issues, particularly in HER2-positive disease. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe examined PTEN-loss and PIK3CA mutations in 1265 EBC patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy within two clinical trials. Two different methods for the evaluation of PTEN IHC were used, one upfront binary (loss; no-loss) and the other initially multi-scale allowing for the classification of "grey zone" tumors with low and very low PTEN protein expression.

resultsPTEN-loss (33.4% and 22.1%, depending on the IHC method) and PIK3CA mutations (29.6%) were associated with ER/PgR/HER2-negative and ER/PgR-positive disease, respectively. Concordance of the two IHC methods was moderate (Cohen's kappa 0.624). PTEN-loss discrepancy and intra-tumor heterogeneity concerned "grey zone" tumors that were prevalent among HER2-positive cancers. PTEN-loss independently conferred higher risk for relapse and death. Compared to single PIK3CA mutations,single PTEN-loss was independently associated with increased risk for relapse and death. Depending on the evaluation method, in HER2-positive cancer, PTEN-loss was without- or of marginal unfavorable prognostic significance.

conclusionIn EBC, PTEN-loss is an independent predictor of poor outcome. When occurring singly, PTEN-loss and PIK3CA mutations have opposite prognostic impact. In HER2-positive disease, assessment of PTEN-loss by IHC appears unreliable and the marker is without clear prognostic significance.

Indexed as

MutationAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, LobularClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesCohort StudiesErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisPTEN PhosphohydrolaseBiomarkers, TumorClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesPIK3CA protein, humanPTEN PhosphohydrolasePTEN protein, humanReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, Progesteroneadjuvant chemotherapydiscordanceHER2-positive breast cancerheterogeneityPI3K pathwayPTEN immunohistochemistrytrastuzumab

Identifiers

PMID31018950
PMCPMC6542648
OpenAlexW2941763515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.