Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31018942›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2019

Genome-Wide Analyses Reveal Footprints of Divergent Selection and Drought Adaptive Traits in Synthetic-Derived Wheats.

Fakiha Afzal, Huihui Li, Alvina Gul, Abid Subhani, Ahmad Ali, Abdul Mujeeb-Kazi, Francis Ogbonnaya, Richard Trethowan, Xianchun Xia, Zhonghu He and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Wheat Omics: Advancements and Opportunities.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. WildGenes · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A WheatInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Fakiha AfzalAtta-ur-Rahman School of Applied Biosciences, National University of Sciences and Technology, H-12 Islamabad, Pakistan.
Huihui LiInstitute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS) and a.rasheed@cgiar.org lihuihui@caas.cn h.li@cgiar.org.
Alvina GulAtta-ur-Rahman School of Applied Biosciences, National University of Sciences and Technology, H-12 Islamabad, Pakistan.
Abid SubhaniBarani Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), Chakwal, Pakistan.
Ahmad AliCenter for Plant Science and Biodiversity, University of Swat, Swat, Paksitan.ORCID 0000-0001-7204-1870
Abdul Mujeeb-KaziTexas A&M University, Amarillo, TX 79106.
Francis OgbonnayaGrains Research & Development Corporation, Kingston, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8596-7362
Richard TrethowanPlant Breeding Institute, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia, and.ORCID 0000-0003-0105-875X
Xianchun XiaInstitute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS) and.
Zhonghu HeInstitute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS) and.
Awais RasheedInstitute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS) and a.rasheed@cgiar.org lihuihui@caas.cn h.li@cgiar.org.ORCID 0000-0003-2528-708X
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNCornell University · USGrains Research and Development Corporation · AUInstitute of Crop Sciences · CNNational University of Sciences and Technology · PKPakistan Agricultural Research Council · PKTexas A&M University · USThe University of Sydney · AUUniversity of Swat · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crop-wild introgressions have long been exploited without knowing the favorable recombination points. Synthetic hexaploid wheats are one of the most exploited genetic resources for bread wheat improvement. However, despite some QTL with major effects, much less is known about genome-wide patterns of introgressions and their effects on phenotypes. We used two genome-wide association approaches: SNP-GWAS and haplotype-GWAS to identify SNPs and haplotypes associated with productivity under water-limited conditions in a synthetic-derived wheat (SYN-DER) population. Haplotype-GWAS further enriched and identified 20 more genomic regions associated with drought adaptability that did not overlap with SNP-GWAS. Since GWAS is biased to the phenotypes in the study and may fail to detect important genetic diversity during breeding, we used five complementary analytical approaches (

Indexed as

Adaptation, BiologicalDroughtsGenome, PlantGenome-Wide Association StudyGenomicsQuantitative Trait, HeritableSelection, GeneticAllelesGene FrequencyGenetic VariationHaplotypesPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait LociSeedsTriticumgenome-wide association studies (GWAS)haplotype analysisselective sweepssingle nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)synthetic-derived wheats (SYN-DER)

Identifiers

PMID31018942
PMCPMC6553533
OpenAlexW2940902501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.