ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2019
Performance comparison of depth-encoding detectors based on dual-ended readout and different SiPMs for high-resolution PET applications.
Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Initial Performance of a Prototype Small Animal PET Scanner Consisting of Long Semi-Monolithic Scintillator Detectors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comprehensive simulation study and preliminary results on various shapes of nanopatterns for light extraction improvement in scintillation crystal.Biomedical engineering letters · 2025Article
- Enhanced Timing Performance of Dual-Ended PET Detectors for Brain Imaging Using Dual-Finishing Crystal Approach.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Performance Comparison of DOI-Encoding PET Detectors Based on 1.1-mm Pitch BGO Arrays With Different Reflectors.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2024Article
- Improvement of Crystal Identification Accuracy for Depth-of-Interaction Detector System with Peak-to-Charge Discrimination Method.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A Wide Energy Range and 4π-View Gamma Camera with Interspaced Position-Sensitive Scintillator Array and Embedded Heavy Metal Bars.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Technical opportunities and challenges in developing total-body PET scanners for mice and rats.EJNMMI physics · 2023Review
- Silicon photomultiplier signal readout and multiplexing techniques for positron emission tomography: a review.Biomedical engineering letters · 2022Review
- Performance of Dual-Ended Readout PET Detectors Based on BGO Arrays and BaSOIEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2022Article
- Performance evaluation of dual-ended readout PET detectors based on BGO arrays with different reflector arrangements.Physics in medicine and biology · 2021Article
- HPhysics in medicine and biology · 2021Article
- Performance of Optical Coupling Materials in Scintillation Detectors Post Temperature Exposure.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Silicon photomultipliers (SiPMs) are widely used in positron emission tomography (PET), however, SiPMs from different vendors vary in their performance characteristics. In addition, the specifications provided by the manufacturers are measured under different operating conditions and using different test setups, making it difficult to choose the optimal device for a specific application using the published specifications. In this work, we evaluated four state-of-the-art 8 × 8 arrays of ~3 × 3 mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.