Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31017930›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Infant crying and the calming response: Parental versus mechanical soothing using swaddling, sound, and movement.

Eline L Möller, Wieke de Vente, Roos Rodenburg

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04534335 (The SSSH's), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04534335 completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

The SSSH's: SNOO Smart Sleeper Use in Post-Operative Infants With Congenital Heart

TypeobservationalSponsorChildren's Mercy Hospital Kansas CityRan2020 to 2022Enrolled11ConditionsCongenital Heart Disease, Infant Development, TechnologyArmsSNOO Smart Sleep from Happiest Baby, Inc
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Rough is salient: a conserved vocal niche to hijack the brain's salience system.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eline L MöllerStichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland, Heemstede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3494-1058
Wieke de VenteResearch Institute of Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Roos RodenburgStichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland, Heemstede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4288-1737
Stichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFrequent infant crying is associated with parental exhaustion, depression, or even infant hospitalization and shaken baby syndrome. Effective prompt soothing methods are lacking for infants under 6 months. We examined whether swaddling, sound, and movement evoked an immediate calming response (CR) when parents soothed their infants and using a smart crib, and whether infant age affected the CR.

methodsInfants' CR was assessed in a community sample of 69 infants (0-6 months) in a counterbalanced experiment with two conditions (parent, smart crib) each composed of three two-minute phases (baseline, supine, soothing). During baseline 1, parent and infant were sitting together; in supine 1, fussiness was elicited by putting the infant suddenly supine, followed by parental soothing (shushing and jiggling of the swaddled infant). Baseline 2, supine 2, and soothing by the crib followed. Fussiness was observed and infant heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV) were recorded. The CR was operationalized as decreased fussiness and HR, and increased HRV during soothing compared to lying supine.

resultsInfant fussiness and HR were lower in both soothing phases compared to the supine phases. Infant HRV tended to be higher during parental soothing than during supine, but did not significantly differ between mechanical soothing and supine. Younger infants responded with a stronger CR (decreased fussiness and increased HRV) to parental soothing, but not to mechanical soothing. For HR, infants' CR was stronger in the crib than in the parent condition, whereas for HRV, infants' CR was stronger in the parent condition. For fussiness, infants' CR tended to be stronger in the parent condition.

conclusionParental and mechanical soothing using swaddling, sound, and movement promptly induced a CR in infants. This has important clinical implications for soothing fussy and crying infants. Future studies should investigate the effects of parental versus mechanical soothing in the home setting.

Indexed as

CryingInfant BehaviorMovementParentsAdultAnxietyElectrocardiographyEmotionsFemaleGestational AgeHeart RateHumansInfantInfant CareInfant, NewbornMale

Identifiers

PMID31017930
PMCPMC6481793
OpenAlexW2942050531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.