Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31017866›Full record

ArticleHealthcare policy = Politiques de sante2019

Integrated Knowledge Translation with Public Health Policy Makers: A Scoping Review.

Logan M Lawrence, Andrea Bishop, Janet Curran

Registry-linked trialAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07284329 (Examining the Efficacy of a Parent-targeted Co-designed Digital Media Intervention to Increase Recruitment Rates Across a Multi-site Randomized Clinical Trial in Canadian NICU's), which is not on this map. Cited by 49 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07284329 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Examining the Efficacy of a Parent-targeted Co-designed Digital Media Intervention to Increase Recruitment Rates Across a Multi-site Randomized Clinical Trial in Canadian NICU's

TypeinterventionalSponsorIWK Health CentreRan2025 to 2026Enrolled787ConditionsConsent ProcessArmsIntervention (Video) Arm
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Supporting Decision Making in Early Years Initiatives: Co-Designing a Child Health Evidence Dashboard.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Logan M LawrenceDalhousie University, Halifax, NS.
Andrea BishopPostdoctoral Fellow IWK, Health Centre, Halifax, NS.
Janet CurranAssociate Professor, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Integrated knowledge translation (iKT) refers to the engagement of knowledge users (e.g., policy makers, clinicians, patients) as active participants in the research process. Theoretically, this involvement enhances research relevancy and usefulness, thereby supporting health system change. However, evidence to support best practices for iKT is lacking, particularly in a public health context and with non-clinical decision-makers. The objectives of this research were to report how decision-maker involvement in public health iKT research has been described and operationalized and whether the process was evaluated. We conducted a scoping review of published literature from January 2005 to December 2017 and extracted information related to iKT involvement, barriers and facilitators and outcomes. Studies typically did not distinguish between different kinds of knowledge users, making it impossible to comment specifically on decision-makers' involvement. Authors believed knowledge user involvement was beneficial to the quality and potential impact of research activities, although corroborating evaluation data were unavailable. Broad research-knowledge user partnerships spanning multiple projects, as well as flexible involvement of knowledge users, enhanced engagement and supported the iKT process.

Indexed as

Health PolicyAdministrative PersonnelCanadaHumansTranslational Research, Biomedical

Identifiers

PMID31017866
PMCPMC7008688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.