Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31017851›Full record

ArticleLanguage, speech, and hearing services in schools2019

Individual Versus Small Group Treatment of Morphological Errors for Children With Developmental Language Disorder.

Sunniva S Eidsvåg, Elena Plante, Trianna Oglivie, Chelsea Privette, Marja-Liisa Mailend

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Language, speech, and hearing services in schools, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Less Versus More: The Effect of Recast Length in Treatment of Grammatical Errors.Language, speech, and hearing services in schools · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Translating Enhanced Conversational Recast to a Telepractice Setting.Language, speech, and hearing services in schools · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sunniva S EidsvågDepartment of Biological and Medical Psychology, University of Bergen, Norway.
Elena PlanteDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, The University of Arizona, Tucson.
Trianna OglivieDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, The University of Arizona, Tucson.
Chelsea PrivetteDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, The University of Arizona, Tucson.
Marja-Liisa MailendDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, The University of Arizona, Tucson.
University of Arizona · USUniversity of Bergen · NO

Funding

Identification of treatment parameters that maximize language treatment efficacy for children. TALK Initiative supplement.R01DC015642 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI MARY ALT, Elena M Plante · 2016 to 2026
$6.8M
Treatment delivery methods for children with SLIR21DC014203 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI PLANTE, ELENA M · 2014 to 2015
$377k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015642NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC014203
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose This study examines the effects of enhanced conversational recast for treating morphological errors in preschoolers with developmental language disorder. The study assesses the effectiveness of this treatment in an individual or group ( n = 2) setting and the possible benefits of exposing a child to his or her partner's treatment target in addition to his or her own. Method Twenty children were assigned to either an individual ( n = 10) or group ( n = 10, 2 per group) condition. Each child received treatment for 1 morpheme (the target morpheme) for approximately 5 weeks. Children in the group condition had a different target from their treatment partner. Pretreatment and end treatment probes were used to compare correct usage of the target morpheme and a control morpheme. For children in the group condition, the correct usage of their treatment partner's target morpheme was also examined. Results Significant treatment effects occurred for both treatment conditions only for morphemes treated directly (target morpheme). There was no statistically significant difference between the treatment conditions at the end of treatment or at follow-up. Children receiving group treatment did not demonstrate significant gains in producing their partner's target despite hearing the target modeled during treatment. Conclusions This study provides the evidence base for enhanced conversational recast treatment in a small group setting, a treatment used frequently in school settings. Results indicate the importance of either attention to the recast or expressive practice (or both) to produce gains with this treatment. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.7859975.

Indexed as

HearingChildChild, PreschoolCommunicationFemaleHearing TestsHumansLanguage Development DisordersLanguage TherapyMaleReproducibility of ResultsSchoolsSpeech-Language Pathology

Identifiers

PMID31017851
PMCPMC6802871
OpenAlexW2924507900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.