Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31017850›Full record

Trial reportHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2019

Long intervals between two doses of HPV vaccines and magnitude of the immune response: a

Vladimir Gilca, Chantal Sauvageau, Gitika Panicker, Gaston De Serres, John Schiller, Manale Ouakki, Elisabeth R Unger

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Rationalizing the HPV vaccination schedule: A long road to a worthwhile destination.Papillomavirus research (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2019
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Vladimir Gilcaa Division of Biological Risks, Quebec Public Health Institute , Quebec , Canada.
Chantal Sauvageaua Division of Biological Risks, Quebec Public Health Institute , Quebec , Canada.
Gitika Panickerc Division of High-Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta , Georgia , USA.
Gaston De Serresa Division of Biological Risks, Quebec Public Health Institute , Quebec , Canada.
John Schillerd Laboratory of Cellular Oncology, National Cancer Institute , Bethesda , USA.
Manale Ouakkia Division of Biological Risks, Quebec Public Health Institute , Quebec , Canada.
Elisabeth R Ungerc Division of High-Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta , Georgia , USA.
Université Laval · CACenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USNational Cancer Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this analysis was to compare the anti-HPV GMTs and their distribution after a 6-month or a 3-8 -y interval between two HPV vaccine doses. The results from two clinical trials, conducted by the same team in the same region, with serological assays performed at the same laboratory using the same ELISA methodology were compared. In the first study, 173 9-10-y-old girls and boys received two doses of 9vHPV vaccine at a 6-month interval; in the second study, 31 girls vaccinated with one dose of 4vHPV at the age of 9-14 y received a dose of 9vHPV 3-8 y later (mean 5.4 y). In both studies, blood samples were collected before and 1 month post second dose. Despite large differences in the time since the first dose, all subjects (100%) were seropositive to the common 4 HPV types (6, 11, 16 and 18) to both vaccines, with comparable GMTs and titer distributions before the second dose. One month post second dose, the GMTs increased 40-91-fold for those with a 6-month interval between doses and 60-82-fold for those with a 3-8-y interval. Titer distributions after the booster dose were comparable in the two studies. These results indicate that 2-dose HPV vaccination schedules with an interval of several years could be used for pre-adolescents. Intervals longer than 6 months may facilitate logistics for immunization programs and could be useful during periods of vaccine shortage or as a transition while the effectiveness of a one-dose schedule is being evaluated.

Indexed as

Immunization ScheduleAdolescentAntibodies, ViralChildEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHuman Papillomavirus Recombinant Vaccine Quadrivalent, Types 6, 11, 16, 18HumansImmunization, SecondaryMalePapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesTime FactorsAntibodies, ViralHuman Papillomavirus Recombinant Vaccine Quadrivalent, Types 6, 11, 16, 18Papillomavirus VaccinesHPV VaccineLong IntervalsOne DoseTwo Doses

Identifiers

PMID31017850
PMCPMC6746485
OpenAlexW2942131485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.