Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31017340›Full record

ArticleThe Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology2019

The genome of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp.).

Stefano Lonardi, María Muñoz-Amatriaín, Qihua Liang, Shengqiang Shu, Steve I Wanamaker, Sassoum Lo, Jaakko Tanskanen, Alan H Schulman, Tingting Zhu, Ming-Cheng Luo and 13 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 185 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
185citing papers in PubMed
53.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

185 citing papers in PubMed, 366 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Application of Omics Technologies for Cowpea Improvement.Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

125 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Stefano LonardiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2696-7274
María Muñoz-AmatriaínDepartment of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4476-1691
Qihua LiangDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA.
Shengqiang ShuUS Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA, 94598, USA.
Steve I WanamakerDepartment of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA.
Sassoum LoDepartment of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA.
Jaakko TanskanenNatural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Helsinki, Finland.
Alan H SchulmanNatural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Helsinki, Finland.
Tingting ZhuDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Ming-Cheng LuoDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Hind AlhakamiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA.
Rachid OunitDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA.
Abid Md HasanDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA.
Jerome VerdierInstitut de Recherche en Horticulture et Semences, INRA, Université d'Angers, 49071, Beaucouzé, France.
Philip A RobertsDepartment of Nematology, University of California, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA.
Jansen R P SantosDepartment of Nematology, University of California, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA.
Arsenio NdeveDepartment of Nematology, University of California, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA.
Jaroslav DoleželCentre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Institute of Experimental Botany, Olomouc, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-6263-0492
Jan VránaCentre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Institute of Experimental Botany, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Samuel A HokinNational Center for Genome Resources, Santa Fe, NM, 87505, USA.
Andrew D FarmerNational Center for Genome Resources, Santa Fe, NM, 87505, USA.
Steven B CannonUS Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Ames, IA, USA.
Timothy J CloseDepartment of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9759-3775
University of California, Riverside · USCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Experimental Botany · CZNational Center for Genome Resources · USUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of Helsinki · FIAgricultural Research Service · USInstitut de Recherche en Horticulture et Semences · FRJoint Genome Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp.) is a major crop for worldwide food and nutritional security, especially in sub-Saharan Africa, that is resilient to hot and drought-prone environments. An assembly of the single-haplotype inbred genome of cowpea IT97K-499-35 was developed by exploiting the synergies between single-molecule real-time sequencing, optical and genetic mapping, and an assembly reconciliation algorithm. A total of 519 Mb is included in the assembled sequences. Nearly half of the assembled sequence is composed of repetitive elements, which are enriched within recombination-poor pericentromeric regions. A comparative analysis of these elements suggests that genome size differences between Vigna species are mainly attributable to changes in the amount of Gypsy retrotransposons. Conversely, genes are more abundant in more distal, high-recombination regions of the chromosomes; there appears to be more duplication of genes within the NBS-LRR and the SAUR-like auxin superfamilies compared with other warm-season legumes that have been sequenced. A surprising outcome is the identification of an inversion of 4.2 Mb among landraces and cultivars, which includes a gene that has been associated in other plants with interactions with the parasitic weed Striga gesnerioides. The genome sequence facilitated the identification of a putative syntelog for multiple organ gigantism in legumes. A revised numbering system has been adopted for cowpea chromosomes based on synteny with common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). An estimate of nuclear genome size of 640.6 Mbp based on cytometry is presented.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingChromosomes, PlantDNA, PlantGenes, PlantGenome, PlantGenome SizePhaseolusRetroelementsSequence Analysis, DNASyntenyVignaDNA, PlantRetroelementschromosomal inversioncowpeadomesticationgenome annotationgenome evolutiongenome sizelegumesnext-generation sequencingPhaseolus vulgarisrepetitive elementsVigna unguiculata

Identifiers

PMID31017340
PMCPMC6852540
OpenAlexW2952059076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.