Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31017225›Full record

ArticleJornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia2019

Speeding up the diagnosis of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in a high-burden region with the use of a commercial line probe assay.

Angela Pires Brandao, Juliana Maira Watanabe Pinhata, Rosangela Siqueira Oliveira, Vera Maria Neder Galesi, Helio Hehl Caiaffa-Filho, Lucilaine Ferrazoli

Open access · diamondAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Correlating genetic mutations with isoniazid phenotypic levels of resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis in a high burden setting.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2021
    Article
  7. Tuberculosis series 2019.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Angela Pires Brandao. Instituto Adolfo Lutz - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6036-9139
Juliana Maira Watanabe Pinhata. Instituto Adolfo Lutz - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5758-6688
Rosangela Siqueira Oliveira. Instituto Adolfo Lutz - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5188-8367
Vera Maria Neder Galesi. Centro de Vigilância Epidemiológica do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, (SP) Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6325-4815
Helio Hehl Caiaffa-Filho. Instituto Adolfo Lutz - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6048-4527
Lucilaine Ferrazoli. Instituto Adolfo Lutz - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5389-7056
Instituto Adolfo Lutz · BRGoverno do Estado de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the rapid diagnosis of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis, by using a commercial line probe assay for rifampicin and isoniazid detection (LPA-plus), in the routine workflow of a tuberculosis reference laboratory.

methodsThe LPA-plus was prospectively evaluated on 341 isolates concurrently submitted to the automated liquid drug susceptibility testing system.

resultsAmong 303 phenotypically valid results, none was genotypically rifampicin false-susceptible (13/13; 100% sensitivity). Two rifampicin-susceptible isolates harboured rpoB mutations (288/290; 99.3% specificity) which, however, were non-resistance-conferring mutations. LPA-plus missed three isoniazid-resistant isolates (23/26; 88.5% sensitivity) and detected all isoniazid-susceptible isolates (277/277; 100% specificity). Among the 38 (11%) invalid phenotypic results, LPA-plus identified 31 rifampicin- and isoniazid-susceptible isolates, one isoniazid-resistant and six as non-Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex.

conclusionsLPA-plus showed excellent agreement (≥91%) and accuracy (≥99%). Implementing LPA-plus in our setting can speed up the diagnosis of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis, yield a significantly higher number of valid results than phenotypic drug susceptibility testing and provide further information on the drug-resistance level.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntitubercular AgentsChildChild, PreschoolDNA, BacterialEarly DiagnosisFemaleHumansInfantIsoniazidMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedAntitubercular AgentsDNA, BacterialIsoniazidRifampin

Identifiers

PMID31017225
PMCPMC6733744
OpenAlexW2938138842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.