Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31016684›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2020

Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioral experiment builder.

Alexander L Anwyl-Irvine, Jessica Massonnié, Adam Flitton, Natasha Kirkham, Jo K Evershed

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05364801 (Impact of Anxiety on the Decision-making Process of Anesthesiologists in the Choice of Drugs for Induction of General Anesthesia of Patients With Aspiration Risk Factors), which is not on this map. Cited by 726 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
726citing papers in PubMed
196.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05364801 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Impact of Anxiety on the Decision-making Process of Anesthesiologists in the Choice of Drugs for Induction of General Anesthesia of Patients With Aspiration Risk Factors

TypeobservationalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de BesanconRan2022 to 2024Enrolled500ConditionsAnxiety, Decision Making, General AnesthesiaArmsSurvey
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

726 citing papers in PubMed, 1,859 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Facial palsy reveals the sensorimotor contribution to facial-emotion recognition.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Accent type modulates frequency-specific neural tracking of speech.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2026
    Article

666 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander L Anwyl-IrvineMRC Cognition and Brain Science Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3792-7745
Jessica MassonniéCentre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck College, University of London, London, UK.
Adam FlittonCauldron.sc: Cauldron Science, St Johns Innovation Centre, Cambridge, UK.
Natasha KirkhamCentre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck College, University of London, London, UK.
Jo K EvershedCauldron.sc: Cauldron Science, St Johns Innovation Centre, Cambridge, UK. Jo.Evershed@cauldron.sc.
Birkbeck, University of London · GBMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit · GBTextron Systems (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UP_A060_1103Medical Research Council MC_UU_00005/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Behavioral researchers are increasingly conducting their studies online, to gain access to large and diverse samples that would be difficult to get in a laboratory environment. However, there are technical access barriers to building experiments online, and web browsers can present problems for consistent timing-an important issue with reaction-time-sensitive measures. For example, to ensure accuracy and test-retest reliability in presentation and response recording, experimenters need a working knowledge of programming languages such as JavaScript. We review some of the previous and current tools for online behavioral research, as well as how well they address the issues of usability and timing. We then present the Gorilla Experiment Builder (gorilla.sc), a fully tooled experiment authoring and deployment platform, designed to resolve many timing issues and make reliable online experimentation open and accessible to a wider range of technical abilities. To demonstrate the platform's aptitude for accessible, reliable, and scalable research, we administered a task with a range of participant groups (primary school children and adults), settings (without supervision, at home, and under supervision, in both schools and public engagement events), equipment (participant's own computer, computer supplied by the researcher), and connection types (personal internet connection, mobile phone 3G/4G). We used a simplified flanker task taken from the attentional network task (Rueda, Posner, & Rothbart, 2004). We replicated the "conflict network" effect in all these populations, demonstrating the platform's capability to run reaction-time-sensitive experiments. Unresolved limitations of running experiments online are then discussed, along with potential solutions and some future features of the platform.

Indexed as

Behavioral ResearchAdultAttentionCell PhoneChildChild, PreschoolCognitionData CollectionFemaleHumansInternetMaleReaction TimeReproducibility of ResultsResearch DesignWeb BrowserAttentional controlBrowser timingOnline methodsOnline researchRemote testingTiming accuracy

Identifiers

PMID31016684
PMCPMC7005094
OpenAlexW2897312833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.