Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31016680›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2019

The acceptability of a direct oral anticoagulant monitoring regimen among patients with atrial fibrillation: a pilot study.

Ali P Mourad, Parisa Aslani, Mario D'Souza, David Brieger

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ali P MouradSydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Edward Ford Building A27, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. amou8351@uni.sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1093-4352
Parisa AslaniFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Mario D'SouzaDepartment of Cardiology, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
David BriegerSydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Edward Ford Building A27, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AUConcord Repatriation General Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background The direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) offer several advantages over warfarin in the management atrial fibrillation, including the provision of fixed dosing without a requirement for regular monitoring. Recently however the subject of DOAC monitoring has been probed after several post-hoc analyses demonstrated an association between plasma levels and efficacy and safety events. Objective The aim of this pilot study was to explore the acceptability of DOAC plasma monitoring amongst patients with atrial fibrillation and the factors that may influence these attitudes. Method A simple DOAC monitoring schedule based on the dabigatran pharmacokinetic profile was developed. A cross-sectional survey was distributed to patients with atrial fibrillation asking them to indicate their likelihood of taking a particular DOAC subjected to plasma monitoring. Results Thirty patients participated in the study. Most patients (63.3%) favoured taking a DOAC subjected to monitoring under the proposed schedule, citing increased efficacy and reduced toxicity as the reasons for their response. Conclusion There is some suggestion that atrial fibrillation patients may in fact favour taking a DOAC subjected to infrequent monitoring if this enhanced safety and efficacy.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAgedAged, 80 and overAnticoagulantsAtrial FibrillationCross-Sectional StudiesDabigatranDrug MonitoringFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsAnticoagulantsDabigatranAnticoagulantsAtrial fibrillationAttitude to healthAustraliaDabigatranDrug monitoring

Identifiers

PMID31016680
OpenAlexW2942015624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.