ArticleCurrent medical science2019
Optimal Cut-off Point of Waist to Height Ratio in Beijing and Its Association with Clusters of Metabolic Risk Factors.
Article in Current medical science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between body roundness index and advanced cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Surrogate indices of insulin resistance using the Matsuda index as reference in adult men-a computational approach.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
- Assessment of Anthropometric Indices for Optimal Cut-Offs for Obesity Screening in a South African Adolescent Population.Biology · 2021Article
- Body roundness index is a superior indicator to associate with the cardio-metabolic risk: evidence from a cross-sectional study with 17,000 Eastern-China adults.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2021Article
- Matrix Gla protein regulates adipogenesis and is serum marker of visceral adiposity.Adipocyte · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A host of studies found waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) having higher diagnostic value than other abdominal obesity anthropometric indicators for metabolic disorders. But the cut-off points are still not consistent. This study was aimed to explore the optimal cut-off point of WHtR in Chinese population and identify the association between WHtR and cluster of metabolic risk factors. In total, 13379 Han adults (7553 men and 5726 women) from over 40 institutions who took physical examination in Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University between January 2014 and January 2015 were involved in this cross-sectional study. Subjects with two or more components of metabolic syndrome (MetS) were considered to have multiple risk factors. Optimal cut-off points of WHtR for cluster of metabolic risk factors were analyzed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The optimal cut-off points of WHtR were 0.51 for men and 0.49 for women. People with elevated WHtR had higher levels of metabolic risk factors. And the prevalence of individual and clusters of 5 risk factors were all higher among WHtR-defined abdominal obesity people than in normal subjects. The optimal cut-off points of WHtR were 0.51 for men and 0.49 for women. In conclusion, people with elevated WHtR are susceptible to cluster of metabolic risk factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.