Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31016492›Full record

ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2020

The Sexual Functioning of Gay and Bisexual Men Following Prostate Cancer Treatment: Results from the Restore Study.

B R Simon Rosser, Nidhi Kohli, Elizabeth J Polter, Lindsey Lesher, Beatrix D Capistrant, Badrinath R Konety, Darryl Mitteldorf, William West, James Dewitt, Gunna Kilian

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

B R Simon RosserDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, 1300 S. 2nd St., #300, Minneapolis, MN, 55454, USA. rosser@umn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8862-531X
Nidhi KohliDepartment of Educational Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Elizabeth J PolterDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, 1300 S. 2nd St., #300, Minneapolis, MN, 55454, USA.
Lindsey LesherDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, 1300 S. 2nd St., #300, Minneapolis, MN, 55454, USA.
Beatrix D CapistrantSchool of Social Work, Smith College, Northampton, MA, USA.
Badrinath R KonetyDepartment of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Darryl MitteldorfMalecare Cancer Support, New York, NY, USA.
William WestDepartment of Writing Studies, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
James DewittDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, 1300 S. 2nd St., #300, Minneapolis, MN, 55454, USA.
Gunna KilianDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, 1300 S. 2nd St., #300, Minneapolis, MN, 55454, USA.
University of Minnesota · USCancerCare · USSmith College · US

Funding

Understanding the Effects of Prostate Cancer on Gay and Bisexual MenR21CA182041 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI ROSSER, B R SIMON · 2014 to 2015
$331k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA182041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBM). Few studies have assessed the effects of treatment on GBM's sexual behavior. For an online survey, 193 gay and bisexual men with prostate cancer were recruited from the North American's largest online cancer support group. Sexual functioning was measured using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) and a tailored Gay Sexual Functioning Inventory (GSFI). GBM have worse EPIC urinary and hormonal function and worse hormonal bother, but better sexual function and bother scores than published norms. In the GSFI, two-thirds of participants described their sexual functioning, post-treatment, as fair to poor. Only 22% reported erections sufficient for insertive anal sex. For receptive anal sex, one-third met criteria for anodyspareunia. Over half reported urination problems during sex or at orgasm. Erectile difficulties were common, severe, and a reason cited for not using condoms. Three men HIV seroconverted post-prostate cancer treatment. Differences in function and bother scores were observed by type of treatment, age, race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, but not relationship status. Sexual functioning significantly predicted long-term mental and physical health. GBM scored significantly worse on mental health and better on physical health than published norms. Sexual recovery after prostate cancer treatment is problematic for most GBM. Research to develop more effective sexual recovery, tailored to the needs of GBM treated for prostate cancer, is needed. Six implications for clinicians treating GBM with prostate cancer are identified.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBisexualityHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProstatic NeoplasmsSexual BehaviorGay and bisexual menProstate cancerSexual dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID31016492
PMCPMC8559526
OpenAlexW2941129366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.