Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31016474›Full record

ArticleAdvances in therapy2019

Three Years Down the Road: The Aftermath of the CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain.

Joseph V Pergolizzi, Melanie Rosenblatt, Jo Ann LeQuang

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04625283 (The Effect and Contribution of a Perioperative Ketamine Infusion in an Established Enhanced Recovery Pathway), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04625283 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

The Effect and Contribution of a Perioperative Ketamine Infusion in an Established Enhanced Recovery Pathway

TypeinterventionalSponsorVanderbilt University Medical CenterRan2021 to 2024Enrolled1,570ConditionsOpioid Use, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery, Anesthesia, KetamineArmsKetamine, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Unintended consequences of United States chronic pain guidelines.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joseph V PergolizziNEMA Research, Inc., Naples, FL, USA.
Melanie RosenblattMelrose Pain Solutions, Naples, FL, USA.
Jo Ann LeQuangNEMA Research, Inc., Naples, FL, USA. joannlequang@gmail.com.
Nema Research (United States) · USHoly Cross Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 2016 CDC guidelines for opioid prescribing by primary care physicians have exposed some shortfalls in our thinking about opioid use and stranded many chronic pain patients with inadequate analgesia. Opioid prescribing rates started to decline in 2012, but still remain high. The response from providers to the 2016 guidelines have led to unintended consequences. Some of the CDC guidance seems arbitrary and not supported by evidence (the 90 MME per day cutoff). Patient and prescriber education, the role of buprenorphine (an atypical Schedule III opioid), and abuse-deterrent opioids are not mentioned at all but could play crucial roles in reducing abuse. Opioid use disorder (OUD) is not defined by the guidance which calls on primary care physicians to recognize and treat it. Opioid withdrawal syndrome is not mentioned and tapering plans, although advised, are not described in a practical way. While the morbidity and mortality associated with OUD are public health crises, so is untreated pain. Chronic pain patients deserve consideration, yet emerge as the silent epidemic within the opioid crisis. To be sure, there is much good in the CDC guidance or any guidelines that urge caution and care in opioid prescribing. Pain specialists must speak out to advocate for patients dealing with pain, to educate patients and prescribers about analgesic options, and to make sure that pain is adequately treated particularly in vulnerable populations.

Indexed as

AdultAnalgesics, OpioidCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.Chronic PainFemaleForecastingGuideline AdherenceHumansMaleMiddle AgedOpioid-Related DisordersPhysicians, Primary CarePractice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'United StatesAnalgesics, OpioidCDC guidelines for opioid prescribingOpioid epidemicOpioids

Identifiers

PMID31016474
PMCPMC6824381
OpenAlexW2942022930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.