Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31016437›Full record

ArticleDocumenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology2019

Electrophysiological and pupillometric measures of inner retina function in nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy.

Jason C Park, Felix Y Chau, Jennifer I Lim, J Jason McAnany

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Visual Evoked Potentials for the Detection of Diabetic Retinal Neuropathy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jason C ParkDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1855 W. Taylor St., MC/648, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Felix Y ChauDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1855 W. Taylor St., MC/648, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Jennifer I LimDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1855 W. Taylor St., MC/648, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
J Jason McAnanyDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1855 W. Taylor St., MC/648, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA. jmcana1@uic.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1192-3487
University of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

Translational Core for Therapeutic and Diagnostic DevelopmentP30EY001792 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI AAKALU, VINAY · 1985 to 2025
$14.8M
Mechanisms of Early Functional Loss in Diabetic Eye DiseaseR01EY026004 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI James JASON McAnany · 2016 to 2026
$4.2M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001792NEI NIH HHS R01 EY026004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate three measures of inner retina function, the pattern electroretinogram (pERG), the photopic negative response (PhNR), and the post-illumination pupil response (PIPR) in diabetics with and without nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR).

methodsFifteen non-diabetic control subjects and 45 type 2 diabetic subjects participated (15 have no clinically apparent retinopathy [NDR], 15 have mild NPDR, and 15 have moderate/severe NPDR). The pERG was elicited by a contrast-reversing checkerboard pattern, and the PhNR was measured in response to a full-field, long-wavelength flash presented against a short-wavelength adapting field. The PIPR was elicited by a full-field, 450 cd/m

resultsANOVA indicated statistically significant differences among the control and diabetic subjects for all three measures. Holm-Sidak post hoc comparisons indicated small, nonsignificant reductions in the pERG (8%), PhNR (8%), and PIPR (10%) for the NDR group compared to the controls (all p > 0.25). In contrast, there were significant reductions in the pERG (35), PhNR (34%), and PIPR (30%) for the mild NPDR group compared to the controls (all p < 0.01). Likewise, there were significant reductions in the pERG (40%), PhNR (32%), and PIPR (32%) for the moderate/severe NPDR group compared to the controls (all p < 0.01).

conclusionAbnormalities of the pERG, PhNR, and PIPR suggest inner retina neural dysfunction in diabetics who have clinically apparent vascular abnormalities. Taken together, these measures provide a noninvasive, objective approach to study neural dysfunction in these individuals.

Indexed as

AdultAnalysis of VarianceColor VisionDiabetic RetinopathyElectroretinographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhotic StimulationPupilRetinaRetinal Ganglion CellsDiabetic retinopathyElectroretinogramPattern electroretinogramPhotopic negative responsePupillometry

Identifiers

PMID31016437
PMCPMC6742572
OpenAlexW2942381396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.