ReviewCurrent gastroenterology reports2019
Novel Non-biologic Targets for Inflammatory Bowel Disease.
Review in Current gastroenterology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Application of advanced treatment in chronic inflammatory bowel diseases].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Use of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Crohn's Disease and Perianal Fistulas: A Narrative Review.Current stem cell research & therapy · 2023Review
- Evaluating Upadacitinib in the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Active Ulcerative Colitis: Design, Development, and Potential Position in Therapy.Drug design, development and therapy · 2022Review
- Targeting JAK/STAT signaling pathways in treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2021Review
- Will mesenchymal stem cells be future directions for treating radiation-induced skin injury?Stem cell research & therapy · 2021Review
- Current Status of Medical Therapy for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: The Wealth of Medications.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThe biologic era revolutionized the medical management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and allowed for a paradigm shift away from a therapeutic strategy that traditionally relied on corticosteroids and immunomodulators. IBD treatment has now further evolved to encompass novel non-biologic agents. RECENT
findingsAn electronic database search, spanning up to September 2018, was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Scopus. Abstracts were also reviewed from Digestive Diseases Week, European Crohn's and Colitis Organization congress, Canadian Digestive Diseases Week, and United European Gastroenterology Week. The JAK1/3 inhibitor, tofacitinib, was shown to both induce and maintain clinical remission and mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis (UC). Also, the sphingosine-1-phosphate (SIP) S1P1/S1P5 receptor agonist ozanimod showed benefit with clinical remission and mucosal healing in UC. Anti-trafficking non-biologic therapies such as AJM300 and a phosphodiesterase (PDE) PDE4 inhibitor, apremilast, have shown benefit in terms of clinical response, clinical remission, and mucosal healing in UC. Upadacitinib and filgotinib have shown initial favorable outcomes in CD patients, with further ongoing trials. Non-biologic agents comprise a growing number of mechanisms of action with the promise of safe and effective oral therapy for patients with IBD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.