Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31016332›Full record

ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2019

[Active surveillance in prostate cancer].

E Erne, S Kaufmann, K Nikolaou, A Stenzl, J Bedke

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

E ErneKlinik für Urologie, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland.
S KaufmannRadiologische Klinik, Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland.
K NikolaouRadiologische Klinik, Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland.
A StenzlKlinik für Urologie, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland.
J BedkeKlinik für Urologie, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland. jens.bedke@med.uni-tuebingen.de.
University of Tübingen · DEUniversitätsklinikum Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer remains among the most commonly diagnosed malignancies worldwide in men. In patients with low-risk prostate cancer, the risk of metastasis and mortality is very low; therefore, a tumor surveillance strategy can be used. In patients undergoing active surveillance, curative active therapy is postponed without compromising opportunities for cure until there is evidence of progression or the patient desires active therapy. The aim of active surveillance in prostate cancer patients is to minimize treatment-related toxicity without impairing patient survival. To maintain patients under active surveillance, the following criteria should be met: prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≤10 ng/ml, Gleason score ≤6, cT1 or cT2a, ≤2 biopsy cores with <50% cancer involvement of every positive core. Follow-up in active surveillance patients is based on repeat biopsy, serial PSA measurements, and digital rectal examination.

Indexed as

BiopsyDigital Rectal ExaminationHumansMaleNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingProstateProstatectomyProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsRisk FactorsProstate-Specific AntigenBiomarkersGleason scoreMetastasisProstate-specific antigenRadical prostatectomy

Identifiers

PMID31016332
OpenAlexW2941770188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.