ArticleRespiratory medicine case reports2019
A common gesture with a rare but potentially severe complication: Re-expansion pulmonary edema following chest tube drainage.
Article in Respiratory medicine case reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Food-Derived Phytochemicals: Multicultural Approaches to Oxidative Stress and Immune Response.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Case Report: Re-expansion pulmonary edema following a pneumothorax drainage in a patient with H1N1 andFrontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- SPLF/SMFU/SRLF/SFAR/SFCTCV Guidelines for the management of patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax.Annals of intensive care · 2023Review
- Lessons from fatal re-expansion pulmonary oedema: case series.Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrimary Spontaneous Pneumothorax (PSP) is usually considered as a benign pathology occurring in young people. In about half of cases, observation only is purposed. In case of intervention, chest tube drainage remains the preponderant strategy even if no studies conclude about superiority of drainage or aspiration. Re-expansion pulmonary edema (REPE) is a rare but potentially severe complication of chest tube drainage. Risk factors are not well identified, but REPE is more frequent for patients with diabetes, younger than 40 years, with large pneumothorax, lung collapse more than one week and fast re-expansion. CASE REPORT: We report a case of a 19-year old male presenting to the Emergency Department with a first episode of PSP. He was treated by chest tube drainage with immediate suction. He developed a REPE 3 hours after chest tube drainage with suction. Conservative management and oxygen therapy led to withdrawing the chest tube 9 days later.
conclusionFor the initial management of PSP, prevention of this complication is essential. In case of risk factors, prevention consist of absence of immediate suction after chest tube drainage and suction should be reserved in case of failure of initial treatment after 24 hours. Even if chest tube drainage is a common gesture, clinical presentation of REPE must alert physicians taking care of these patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.