Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31015755›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedics

Patient satisfaction - A comparison between patient-specific implants and conventional total knee arthroplasty.

Pia Reimann, Martin Brucker, Dariusch Arbab, Christian Lüring

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. [Expert consensus on clinical pathway of high-conformity total knee arthroplasty under the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. [The importance of individual knee arthroplasty].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Personalized statistical modeling of soft tissue structures in the knee.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Custom TKA: what to expect and where do we stand today?Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Contemporary knee arthroplasty: one fits all or time for diversity?Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pia ReimannDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Klinikum Dortmund gGmbH, Beurhausstraße 40, 44137 Dortmund, Germany.
Martin BruckerDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Klinikum Dortmund gGmbH, Beurhausstraße 40, 44137 Dortmund, Germany.
Dariusch ArbabDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Klinikum Dortmund gGmbH, Beurhausstraße 40, 44137 Dortmund, Germany.
Christian LüringDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Klinikum Dortmund gGmbH, Beurhausstraße 40, 44137 Dortmund, Germany.
Klinikum Dortmund · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite recent innovations in total knee arthroplasty, 20% of the patients are not completely satisfied with the clinical results. Regarding patient-specific implants (PSI), the study aims to compare individual and off-the-shelf implant (OSI) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) concerning the postoperative outcome like function and global patient satisfaction.

methodsIn 2013/14 228 patients received a TKA due to primary osteoarthritis with an indication for a bicondylar, cruciate retaining prosthesis. 125 patients received a PSI and 103 an OSI TKA. The outcome after surgery was evaluated retrospectively by two questionnaires and a clinical follow-up examination. The Knee Society Score (KSS) was used to evaluate function. To compare the satisfaction the Knee Injury and Osteoarthrosis Outcome Score (KOOS) and a modified EuroQol (EQ) including five additional questions were used. Finally, 84 patients with PSI and 57 with OSI completed follow-up.

resultsConcerning demographic data, the PSI group showed a significantly younger age, five years on average. The ROM was comparable in both groups. The KSS and the separate function score achieved significantly better results in the PSI group. For subjects with PSI TKA, the global satisfaction showed significant better values.

conclusionsThe significantly higher values in KSS and its function score lead to a better basic daily function in PSI group. In addition, the PSI TKA achieved a higher global patient satisfaction. Nevertheless, both should mainly be assessed in the context of average younger age and the influence of expectations.

Indexed as

Clinical outcomePatient-specific implantPROMSatisfactionTKA

Identifiers

PMID31015755
PMCPMC6475628
OpenAlexW2939173580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.