Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31015566›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Pharmacological boost of DNA damage response and repair by enhanced biogenesis of DNA damage response RNAs.

Ubaldo Gioia, Sofia Francia, Matteo Cabrini, Silvia Brambillasca, Flavia Michelini, Corey W Jones-Weinert, Fabrizio d'Adda di Fagagna

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ubaldo GioiaIFOM - the FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Via Adamello 16, 20139, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4993-5283
Sofia FranciaIFOM - the FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Via Adamello 16, 20139, Milan, Italy.
Matteo CabriniIstituto di Genetica Molecolare, Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza - Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, 27100, Pavia, Italy.
Silvia BrambillascaIFOM - the FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Via Adamello 16, 20139, Milan, Italy.
Flavia MicheliniIFOM - the FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Via Adamello 16, 20139, Milan, Italy.
Corey W Jones-WeinertIFOM - the FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Via Adamello 16, 20139, Milan, Italy.
Fabrizio d'Adda di FagagnaIFOM - the FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Via Adamello 16, 20139, Milan, Italy. fabrizio.dadda@ifom.eu.
IFOM · ITIstituto di Genetica Molecolare · ITMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

Worldwide Cancer Research 14-1331
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A novel class of small non-coding RNAs called DNA damage response RNAs (DDRNAs) generated at DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in a DROSHA- and DICER-dependent manner has been shown to regulate the DNA damage response (DDR). Similar molecules were also reported to guide DNA repair. Here, we show that DDR activation and DNA repair can be pharmacologically boosted by acting on such non-coding RNAs. Cells treated with enoxacin, a compound previously demonstrated to augment DICER activity, show stronger DDR signalling and faster DNA repair upon exposure to ionizing radiations compared to vehicle-only treated cells. Enoxacin stimulates DDRNA production at chromosomal DSBs and at dysfunctional telomeres, which in turn promotes 53BP1 accumulation at damaged sites, therefore in a miRNA-independent manner. Increased 53BP1 occupancy at DNA lesions induced by enoxacin ultimately suppresses homologous recombination, channelling DNA repair towards faster and more accurate non-homologous end-joining, including in post-mitotic primary neurons. Notably, augmented DNA repair stimulated by enoxacin increases the survival also of cancer cells treated with chemotherapeutic agents.

Indexed as

DNA DamageDNA End-Joining RepairEnoxacinHeLa CellsHumansMicroRNAsSignal TransductionTelomereTumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1EnoxacinMicroRNAsTP53BP1 protein, humanTumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1

Identifiers

PMID31015566
PMCPMC6478851
OpenAlexW2941332364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.