Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31015539›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Retention of beneficial molecules and coagulation factors during haemodialysis and haemodiafiltration.

Manuel Voigt, Michael Gebert, Ulrike Haug, Michael Hulko, Markus Storr, Adriana Boschetti-de-Fierro, Werner Beck, Bernd Krause

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Expanded hemodialysis: what's up, Doc?Clinical kidney journal · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Manuel VoigtBaxter International Inc., Research & Development, Holger-Crafoord-Str. 26, 72379, Hechingen, Germany.
Michael GebertBaxter International Inc., Research & Development, Holger-Crafoord-Str. 26, 72379, Hechingen, Germany.
Ulrike HaugBaxter International Inc., Research & Development, Holger-Crafoord-Str. 26, 72379, Hechingen, Germany.
Michael HulkoBaxter International Inc., Research & Development, Holger-Crafoord-Str. 26, 72379, Hechingen, Germany.
Markus StorrBaxter International Inc., Research & Development, Holger-Crafoord-Str. 26, 72379, Hechingen, Germany.
Adriana Boschetti-de-FierroBaxter International Inc., Research & Development, Holger-Crafoord-Str. 26, 72379, Hechingen, Germany. adriana_boschetti@baxter.com.
Werner BeckBaxter International Inc., Research & Development, Holger-Crafoord-Str. 26, 72379, Hechingen, Germany.
Bernd KrauseBaxter International Inc., Research & Development, Holger-Crafoord-Str. 26, 72379, Hechingen, Germany.
Baxter (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Middle molecules (MMs) are associated with the pathology of uraemia, and are not effectively removed by standard extracorporeal treatments. Increased convection used in haemodiafiltration (HDF) can enhance the removal of MMs; however, high-volume HDF is not available to all patients. The new medium cut-off (MCO) membrane has been developed to allow increased removal of MMs using standard haemodialysis (HD). Improved removal of MMs has been shown with the MCO membrane compared with standard high-flux dialysers, but it is not known whether the increased pore size affects the retention of commonly used medications or that of coagulation factors in dialysis patients. Using an in vitro model, the retention of erythropoietin, heparin, insulin, vancomycin and several coagulation factors (Factors II, VII and X, protein C and antithrombin III) was investigated with the MCO membrane dialyser, compared with high-flux dialysers with polysulfone (in HDF) or polyethersulfone membranes (in HD and HDF). The retention of all molecules investigated was comparable between the MCO membrane and the high-flux dialysers. Results from the in vitro studies suggest that switching from a high-flux dialyser to the MCO membrane should not require changes to the medication dosing or anti-coagulation protocols of dialysis patients.

Indexed as

HemodiafiltrationBlood Coagulation FactorsErythropoietinHeparinHumansInsulinMolecular WeightVancomycinBlood Coagulation FactorsErythropoietinHeparinInsulinVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID31015539
PMCPMC6478905
OpenAlexW2941303201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.