Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31015535›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Evaluation of a Chicken 600K SNP genotyping array in non-model species of grouse.

Piotr Minias, Peter O Dunn, Linda A Whittingham, Jeff A Johnson, Sara J Oyler-McCance

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Pseudoreplication in genomic-scale data sets.Molecular ecology resources · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Piotr MiniasDepartment of Biodiversity Studies and Bioeducation, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Łódź, Banacha 1/3, 90-237, Łódź, Poland. pminias@op.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7742-6750
Peter O DunnDepartment of Biodiversity Studies and Bioeducation, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Łódź, Banacha 1/3, 90-237, Łódź, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7450-4194
Linda A WhittinghamBehavioral and Molecular Ecology Group, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Jeff A JohnsonDepartment of Biological Sciences, Institute of Applied Sciences, University of North Texas, Denton, Texas, USA.
Sara J Oyler-McCanceU.S. Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Center, Ft. Collins, Colorado, USA.
University of Łódź · PLUnited States Geological Survey · USUniversity of North Texas · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Milwaukee · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays to generate large SNP datasets for comparison purposes have recently become an attractive alternative to other genotyping methods. Although most SNP arrays were originally developed for domestic organisms, they can be effectively applied to wild relatives to obtain large panels of SNPs. In this study, we tested the cross-species application of the Affymetrix 600K Chicken SNP array in five species of North American prairie grouse (Centrocercus and Tympanuchus genera). Two individuals were genotyped per species for a total of ten samples. A high proportion (91%) of the total 580 961 SNPs were genotyped in at least one individual (73-76% SNPs genotyped per species). Principal component analysis with autosomal SNPs separated the two genera, but failed to clearly distinguish species within genera. Gene ontology analysis identified a set of genes related to morphogenesis and development (including genes involved in feather development), which may be primarily responsible for large phenotypic differences between Centrocercus and Tympanuchus grouse. Our study provided evidence for successful cross-species application of the chicken SNP array in grouse which diverged ca. 37 mya from the chicken lineage. As far as we are aware, this is the first reported application of a SNP array in non-passerine birds, and it demonstrates the feasibility of using commercial SNP arrays in research on non-model bird species.

Indexed as

Genotyping TechniquesAnimalsChickensChromosomesGalliformesGenetic LociHeterozygotePolymorphism, Single NucleotidePrincipal Component Analysis

Identifiers

PMID31015535
PMCPMC6478925
OpenAlexW2942379619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.