Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31015343›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2019

Reward Prediction Error Modulates Saccade Vigor.

Ehsan Sedaghat-Nejad, David J Herzfeld, Reza Shadmehr

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Consensus Paper: Cerebellum and Reward.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Common Mechanisms of Learning in Motor and Cognitive Systems.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The cost of correcting for error during sensorimotor adaptation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ehsan Sedaghat-NejadLaboratory for Computational Motor Control, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205 e.sedaghatnejad@gmail.com shadmehr@jhu.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6732-1296
David J HerzfeldLaboratory for Computational Motor Control, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205.ORCID 0000-0001-9910-0658
Reza ShadmehrLaboratory for Computational Motor Control, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205 e.sedaghatnejad@gmail.com shadmehr@jhu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7686-2569
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

The multiple components of motor memoryR01NS078311 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SHADMEHR, REZA · 2012 to 2021
$3.8M
Effort, reward and vigor in decision making and movement controlR01NS096083 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI AHMED, ALAA A. · 2017 to 2021
$2.3M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS078311NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS096083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Movement vigor, defined as the reciprocal of the latency from availability of reward to its acquisition, changes with reward magnitude: movements exhibit shorter reaction time and increased velocity when they are directed toward more rewarding stimuli. This invigoration may be due to release of dopamine before movement onset, which has been shown to be modulated by events that signal reward prediction error (RPE). Here, we generated an RPE event in the milliseconds before movement onset and tested whether there was a relationship between RPE and vigor. Human subjects (both sexes) made saccades toward an image. During execution of the primary saccade, we probabilistically changed the position and content of that image, encouraging a secondary saccade. On some trials, the content of the secondary image was more valuable than the first image, resulting in a positive RPE (+RPE) event that preceded the secondary saccade. On other trials, this content was less valuable (-RPE event). We found that reaction time of the secondary saccade was affected in an orderly fashion by the magnitude and direction of the preceding RPE event: the most vigorous saccades followed the largest +RPE, whereas the least vigorous saccades followed the largest -RPE. Presence of the secondary saccade indicated that the primary saccade had experienced a movement error, inducing trial-to-trial adaptation. However, this learning from movement error was not modulated by the RPE event. The data suggest that RPE events, which are thought to transiently alter the release of dopamine, modulate the vigor of the ensuing movement.

Indexed as

RewardAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationReaction TimeSaccadesYoung Adultdopaminelatencymotor controlreward prediction errorsaccadevigor

Identifiers

PMID31015343
PMCPMC6670245
OpenAlexW2950483051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.