Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31015276›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Rest Evaluation for Active Concussion Treatment (ReAct) Protocol: a prospective cohort study of levels of physical and cognitive rest after youth sports-related concussion.

Jingzhen Yang, Keith Yeates, Lindsay Sullivan, Bhavna Singichetti, Alison Newton, Pengcheng Xun, H Gerry Taylor, James MacDonald, Thomas Pommering, Michael Tiso and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jingzhen YangCenter for Injury Research and Policy, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Keith YeatesPsychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7680-2892
Lindsay SullivanCenter for Injury Research and Policy, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Bhavna SingichettiCenter for Injury Research and Policy, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Alison NewtonCenter for Injury Research and Policy, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Pengcheng XunDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
H Gerry TaylorPediatrics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
James MacDonaldPediatrics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Thomas PommeringPediatrics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Michael TisoSport and Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Daniel CohenPediatrics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Yungui HuangResearch Information Solution and Innovation, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Jeremy PattersonResearch Information Solution and Innovation, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Zhong-Lin LuPsychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Nationwide Children's Hospital · USThe Ohio State University · USIndiana University Bloomington · USUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

Optimal Physical and Cognitive Rest after Sports-Related Concussions among YouthR21HD086451 · NICHD · RESEARCH INST NATIONWIDE CHILDREN'S HOSP · PI YANG, JINGZHEN GINGER · 2016 to 2017
$428k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD086451
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough current guidelines for the early clinical management of sports-related concussion (SRC) call for a gradual return-to-activity, the optimal level of rest needed to promote recovery remains unknown. This paper describes the protocol of the Rest Evaluation for Active Concussion Treatment (ReAct) study which objectively measures physical and cognitive rest following SRC and its relation to recovery among youth athletes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Youth athletes aged 11-17 years are recruited preinjury and enrolled within 72 hours following a physician-diagnosed concussion. Injury information and acute clinical presentation are assessed at the time of injury. Youth participants are prospectively followed to objectively monitor daily physical and cognitive rest using two electronic devices: ActiGraph (to measure physical rest and sleep) and Narrative Clip (to measure cognitive rest), along with self-reported postconcussive symptoms using daily surveys. Other concussion outcomes, including functional outcomes, are assessed by surveying youth and their parents at three time points: (1) within 72 hours of injury, (2) at day 7 postenrolment and (3) at symptom resolution (or a maximum of 45 days postconcussion). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has received ethical approval from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the participating institution (IRB at Nationwide Children's Hospital, IRB16-00613). The results of the study will be presented at national and international scientific conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals.

Indexed as

RestAdolescentAthletic InjuriesBrain ConcussionChildFemaleHumansMalePost-Concussion SyndromeProspective StudiesYouth Sportscognitive restphysical restprotocolsports-related concussionyouth

Identifiers

PMID31015276
PMCPMC6501995
OpenAlexW2941310359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.