Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31015225›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2019

GPs' and practice staff's views of a telephone first approach to demand management: a qualitative study in primary care.

Jennifer Newbould, Josephine Exley, Sarah Ball, Jennie Corbett, Emma Pitchforth, Martin Roland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. What patients want from access to UK general practice: systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Uses of Virtual Care in Primary Care: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Access systems in general practice: a systematic scoping review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jennifer NewbouldCambridge Centre for Health Services Research, RAND Europe, Cambridge.
Josephine ExleyCambridge Centre for Health Services Research, RAND Europe, Cambridge.
Sarah BallCambridge Centre for Health Services Research, RAND Europe, Cambridge.
Jennie CorbettCambridge Centre for Health Services Research, RAND Europe, Cambridge.
Emma PitchforthPrimary Care Group, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter.
Martin RolandCambridge Centre for Health Services Research, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo better manage patient demand, some general practices have implemented a 'telephone first' approach in which all patients seeking a face-to-face appointment first have to speak to a GP on the telephone. Previous studies have suggested that there is considerable scope for this new approach, but there remain significant concerns.

aimTo understand the views of GPs and practice staff of the telephone first approach, and to identify enablers and barriers to successful adoption of the approach. DESIGN AND

settingA qualitative study of the telephone first approach in 12 general practices that have adopted it, and two general practices that have tried the approach but reverted to their previous system.

methodA total of 53 qualitative interviews with GPs and practice staff were conducted. Transcriptions of the interviews were systematically analysed.

resultsStaff in the majority of practices reported that the approach was an improvement on their previous system, but all practices experienced challenges; for example, where practices did not have the capacity to meet the increase in demand for telephone consultations. Staff were also aware that the new system suited some patients better than others. Adoption of the telephone first approach could be very stressful, with a negative impact on morale, especially reported in interviews with the two practices that had tried but stopped the approach. Interviewees identified enablers and barriers to the successful adoption of a telephone first approach in primary care. Enablers to successful adoption were: understanding demand, practice staff as pivotal, making modifications to the approach, and educating patients.

conclusionPractices considering adopting or clinical commissioning groups considering funding a telephone first approach should consider carefully a practice's capacity and capability before launching.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelInterviews as TopicPatient PreferencePrimary Health CareRemote ConsultationAppointments and SchedulesGeneral PractitionersHumansOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CareQualitative ResearchUnited KingdomWorkloadconsultationgeneral practiceGPs, primary care

Identifiers

PMID31015225
PMCPMC6478459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.