Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31015131›Full record

ArticleRadiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology2019

Quantitative evaluation of 4D Cone beam CT scans with reduced scan time in lung cancer patients.

Abigail Bryce-Atkinson, Thomas Marchant, John Rodgers, Geoff Budgell, Alan McWilliam, Corinne Faivre-Finn, Gillian Whitfield, Marcel van Herk

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Abigail Bryce-AtkinsonDivision of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, UK. Electronic address: abigail.bryce-atkinson@postgrad.manchester.ac.uk.
Thomas MarchantThe University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, UK; Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
John RodgersRadiotherapy Department, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Geoff BudgellChristie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Alan McWilliamDivision of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, UK.
Corinne Faivre-FinnDivision of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, UK; The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Gillian WhitfieldChristie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; The Children's Brain Tumour Research Network, The University of Manchester, Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, UK.
Marcel van HerkDivision of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, UK.
University of Manchester · GBManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK C147/A18083Cancer Research UK C147/A25254
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeImage guided radiotherapy (IGRT) based on respiration correlated cone-beam CT (4D-CBCT) provides accurate tumour localisation in lung cancer patients by taking into account respiratory motion when deriving setup correction. However, 4D-CBCT scan times are typically longer than for acquisition of 3D-CBCT scans, e.g. 4 min. This work aims to quantitatively evaluate the effect of reduced scan times on 4D-CBCT image quality and registration accuracy in lung cancer patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Scan times down to 1 min were simulated by retaining only projection images corresponding to every second, third or fourth respiratory cycle in forty-four 4D-CBCTs from 15 lung cancer patients. In addition twenty 2-minute scans were acquired for 12 lung cancer patients. Image quality was quantified by assessing registration accuracy in the shorter scan times, comparing to the 4-minute scan registration result where available as reference.

resultsUse of 2-minute scans had little impact on registration accuracy or ability to detect tumour motion: automatic registration accuracy was within 2 mm in 6/8 scans analysed with 2-minute acquisitions, and 96.6% of registration discrepancies were within 2 mm for the simulated scans. When the scan time simulated was below 2 min, automatic registration results still agreed within 2 mm for 84.7% of scans, however visual image quality was considerably degraded.

conclusionA 4D-CBCT acquisition time of 2 min produces scans of sufficient image quality for IGRT in most lung cancer patients, as demonstrated quantitatively by assessing the impact on automatic registration accuracy in simulated and real acquisitions.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationCone-Beam Computed TomographyFour-Dimensional Computed TomographyHumansLung NeoplasmsRadionuclide ImagingRadiotherapy, Image-GuidedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedRespiratory MechanicsRetrospective StudiesImage guided

Identifiers

PMID31015131
PMCPMC6598855
OpenAlexW2936192685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.