Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31015121›Full record

ArticleRadiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology2019

Differential inflammatory response dynamics in normal lung following stereotactic body radiation therapy with protons versus photons.

Yanjing Li, Michael Dykstra, Till D Best, Jennifer Pursley, Nitish Chopra, Florence K Keane, Melin J Khandekar, Gregory C Sharp, Harald Paganetti, Henning Willers and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. NRG Oncology White Paper on the Relative Biological Effectiveness in Proton Therapy.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Noninvasive Quantification of Radiation-Induced Lung Injury Using a Targeted Molecular Imaging Probe.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Imaging Follow-Up of Nonsurgical Therapies for Lung Cancer:AJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2023
    Review
  10. An Agent-Based Model of Radiation-Induced Lung Fibrosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Roadmap: proton therapy physics and biology.Physics in medicine and biology · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yanjing LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
Michael DykstraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Till D BestDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
Jennifer PursleyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
Nitish ChopraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
Florence K KeaneDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
Melin J KhandekarDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
Gregory C SharpDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
Harald PaganettiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
Henning WillersDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
Florian J FintelmannDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
Clemens GrassbergerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA. Electronic address: Grassberger.Clemens@mgh.harvard.edu.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Statistics, Data Exchange, Management and SupportP01CA021239 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI DELANEY, THOMAS F · 1985 to 2013
$28.3M
Project 3: Enhanced Sensitivity of Tumors to Proton Beam Therapy: Mechanisms and Biomarkers.P01CA261669 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HONG, THEODORE S · 2021 to 2025
$14.0M
MDACC Clinical and Research Physics SupportU19CA021239 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI MOHAN, RADHE · 2014 to 2018
$11.2M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA021239NCI NIH HHS P01 CA261669NCI NIH HHS U19 CA021239
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeTo compare time-dependent changes in lung parenchyma of early-stage non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients after stereotactic body radiation therapy with protons (SBPT) or photons (SBRT). MATERIALS AND

methodWe retrospectively identified NSCLC patients treated with SBPT and matched each one with a SBRT patient by patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics. Lung parenchyma on serial post-treatment chest computer tomography (CT) scans was deformably registered with the treatment plan to analyze lung density changes as function of dose, quantified by Houndsfield Unit (HU)/Gy. A thoracic radiologist also evaluated the CTs using an established grading system.

resultsWe matched 23 SBPT/SBRT pairs, including 5 patients treated with both modalities (internally matched cohort). Normal lung response following SBPT significantly increased in the early time period (CTs acquired <6 months, median 3 months) post-treatment, and then did not change significantly in the later time period (CTs acquired 6-14 months, median 9 months). For SBRT, the normal lung response was similar to SBPT in the early time period, but then increased significantly from the early to the late time period (p = 0.007). These differences were most pronounced in sensitive (response >6 HU/Gy) patients and in the internally matched cohort. However, there was no significant difference in the maximum observed response in the entire cohort over all time periods, median 3.4 [IQR, 1.0-5.4] HU/Gy (SBPT) versus 2.5 [1.6-5.2] HU/Gy (SBRT). Qualitative radiological evaluation was highly correlated with the quantitative analysis (p < 0.0001).

conclusionWhile there was no significant difference in maximum response after SBPT versus SBRT, dose-defined lung inflammation occurred earlier after proton irradiation. Further investigation is warranted into the mechanisms of inflammation and therapeutic consequences after proton versus photon irradiation.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungFemaleHumansInflammationLungLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPhotonsProton TherapyRadiosurgeryRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedDose–response relationshipProton therapyRadiation pneumonitisRadiosurgery

Identifiers

PMID31015121
PMCPMC6592748
OpenAlexW2939816773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.