Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31015101›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental child psychology2019

Different neural processes underlie visual speech perception in school-age children and adults: An event-related potentials study.

Natalya Kaganovich, Elizabeth Ancel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental child psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Natalya KaganovichDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA; Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA. Electronic address: kaganovi@purdue.edu.
Elizabeth AncelDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.

Funding

Audiovisual processing in specific language impairmentR03DC013151 · NIDCD · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI KAGANOVICH, NATALYA · 2013 to 2015
$444k
NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC013151
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to use visual speech cues does not fully develop until late adolescence. The cognitive and neural processes underlying this slow maturation are not yet understood. We examined electrophysiological responses of younger (8-9 years) and older (11-12 years) children as well as adults elicited by visually perceived articulations in an audiovisual word matching task and related them to the amount of benefit gained during a speech-in-noise (SIN) perception task when seeing the talker's face. On each trial, participants first heard a word and, after a short pause, saw a speaker silently articulate a word. In half of the trials the articulated word matched the auditory word (congruent trials), whereas in the other half it did not (incongruent trials). In all three age groups, incongruent articulations elicited the N400 component and congruent articulations elicited the late positive complex (LPC). Groups did not differ in the mean amplitude of N400. The mean amplitude of LPC was larger in younger children compared with older children and adults. Importantly, the relationship between event-related potential measures and SIN performance varied by group. In 8- and 9-year-olds, neither component was predictive of SIN gain. The LPC amplitude predicted the SIN gain in older children but not in adults. Conversely, the N400 amplitude predicted the SIN gain in adults. We argue that although all groups were able to detect correspondences between auditory and visual word onsets at the phonemic/syllabic level, only adults could use this information for lexical access.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAdultChildComprehensionCuesElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansMaleNoisePhotic StimulationSpeech PerceptionVisual PerceptionAudiovisual matchingAudiovisual word perceptionLate positive complexLexical accessMultisensory developmentN400Speech-in-noise perception

Identifiers

PMID31015101
PMCPMC6857813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.