Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31014993›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in cell biology2019

Regulation of Drosophila germline stem cells.

Elizabeth W Kahney, Jonathan C Snedeker, Xin Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in cell biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Asymmetric division of stem cells and its cancer relevance.Cell regeneration (London, England) · 2024
    Review
  12. ThebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Genetic and Epigenetic Regulation ofJournal of developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elizabeth W KahneyDepartment of Biology, The Johns Hopkins University, 3400 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Jonathan C SnedekerDepartment of Biology, The Johns Hopkins University, 3400 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Xin ChenDepartment of Biology, The Johns Hopkins University, 3400 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA. Electronic address: xchen32@jhu.edu.

Funding

CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGYT32GM007231 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI VAN DOREN, MARK B · 1985 to 2020
$18.4M
Study epigenetic inheritance during development, homeostasis and regenerationR35GM127075 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Xin Chen · 2018 to 2026
$3.2M
Molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying asymmetric histone inheritanceR01GM112008 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CHEN, XIN, XIAO, JIE · 2014 to 2017
$1.6M
Investigating epigenetic inheritance patterns and mechanisms during asymmetric division of Drosophila female germline stem cellsF31GM122339 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KAHNEY, ELIZABETH WILLA · 2017 to 2018
$89k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS F31 GM122339NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM112008NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM127075NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The asymmetric division of adult stem cells into one self-renewing stem cell and one differentiating cell is critical for maintaining homeostasis in many tissues. One paradigmatic model of this division is the Drosophila male and female germline stem cell, which provides two model systems not only sharing common features but also having distinct characteristics for studying asymmetric stem cell division in vivo. This asymmetric division is controlled by a combination of extrinsic signaling molecules and intrinsic factors that are either asymmetrically segregated or regulated differentially following division. In this review, we will discuss recent advances in understanding the molecular and cellular mechanisms guiding this asymmetric outcome, including extrinsic cues, intrinsic factors governing cell fate specification, and cell cycle control.

Indexed as

AnimalsAsymmetric Cell DivisionCell CycleDrosophilaGerm CellsModels, BiologicalStem Cells

Identifiers

PMID31014993
PMCPMC6756965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.