Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31014685›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology. Retina2019

Imaging Characteristics of Choroidal Neovascular Lesions in the AREDS2-HOME Study: Report Number 4.

Amitha Domalpally, Traci E Clemons, Susan B Bressler, Ronald P Danis, Michael Elman, Judy E Kim, David Brown, Emily Y Chew

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology. Retina, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Clinical characteristics and visual outcomes of non-resolving subretinal fluid in neovascular AMD despite continuous monthly anti-VEGF injections: a long-term follow-up.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Amitha DomalpallyDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin. Electronic address: domalpally@wisc.edu.
Traci E ClemonsThe EMMES Corporation, Rockville, Maryland.
Susan B BresslerWilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Ronald P DanisDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin.
Michael ElmanElman Retina Group, Baltimore, Maryland.
Judy E KimDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
David BrownRetina Consultants of Houston, Houston, Texas.
Emily Y ChewNational Eye Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USElman Retina Group · USEmmes (United States) · USJohns Hopkins University · USMedical College of Wisconsin · USNational Eye Institute · USRetina Consultants of Texas · US

Funding

The Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 (AREDS2)ZIAEY000485 · NEI · NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE · PI CHEW, EMILY Y · 2009 to 2015
$990k
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA EY000485
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo characterize choroidal neovascular (CNV) lesions and the corresponding change in visual acuity (VA) in eyes that converted to neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2-HOme Monitoring of the Eye Study. (AREDS2-HOME Study).

designCohort study.

participantsA total of 1520 participants at risk of developing CNV were enrolled, each of whom contributed 1 or both study eye(s) that had a best-corrected VA letter score of ≥54 letters (Snellen equivalent 20/60) and ≥1 large (≥125 μm) macular druse in the absence of neovascular AMD or central geographic atrophy.

methodsA multicenter clinical trial comparing standard care (SC) versus SC plus ForeseeHome (FH; Notal Vision, Manassas, VA) monitoring strategy in the detection of neovascular AMD. Fluorescein angiograms (FA) and OCT were evaluated by an independent reading center (RC) from the visit in which the ophthalmologist identified progression to CNV (n = 82 eyes).

main outcome measuresDevelopment of CNV on OCT, FA, or both.

resultsThe RC confirmed CNV in 67 of 82 eyes (82%); lesions were confirmed in 42 of 70 eyes (60%) with FA, 59 of 72 eyes (82%) with OCT, and on both images in 34 of 67 eyes (51%). Among the FA-confirmed cases, the median lesion size was 0.82 disc area (DA); lesions were subfoveal in 40.5%, occult CNV composition was present in 54.8%, and associated hemorrhage in 50%. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) lesion size on FA was 0.23 (0.0-0.91) DA versus 0.70 (0.0-1.50) DA, P = 0.051) in the FH and SC eyes, respectively. Among the OCT-confirmed cases median (IQR) center point thickness was 209 (175-274) μm, retinal pigment epithelial lesion complex was present in 86.4%, and subretinal fluid (SRF) was present in 76.3%. The median change in VA from baseline was -4.0 letters and -10.0 letters in the FH and SC eyes (P = 0.008) confirmed as CNV at the RC.

conclusionsIncident CNV lesions were more prevalent on OCT images than on FA; however, the use of both OCT and FA enhanced detection of incident lesions. Lesions were smaller and associated with less vision loss among eyes in the FH group.

Indexed as

Visual AcuityChoroidFluorescein AngiographyFollow-Up StudiesFundus OculiHumansRetinal Pigment EpitheliumSeverity of Illness IndexTime FactorsTomography, Optical CoherenceWet Macular Degeneration

Identifiers

PMID31014685
PMCPMC12074534
OpenAlexW2909356997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.