Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31014368›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2019

Timing gone awry: distinct tumour suppressive and oncogenic roles of the circadian clock and crosstalk with hypoxia signalling in diverse malignancies.

Wai Hoong Chang, Alvina G Lai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Circadian Rhythms, Disease and Chronotherapy.Journal of biological rhythms · 2021
    Review
  11. Actigraphy-measured rest-activity circadian rhythm disruption in patients with advanced cancer: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wai Hoong ChangNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Oxford, OX3 7FZ, UK.
Alvina G LaiNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Oxford, OX3 7FZ, UK. Alvina.Lai@ndm.ox.ac.uk.
University of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe circadian clock governs a large variety of fundamentally important physiological processes in all three domains of life. Consequently, asynchrony in timekeeping mechanisms could give rise to cellular dysfunction underpinning many disease pathologies including human neoplasms. Yet, detailed pan-cancer evidence supporting this notion has been limited.

methodsIn an integrated approach uniting genomic, transcriptomic and clinical data of 21 cancer types (n = 18,484), we interrogated copy number and transcript profiles of 32 circadian clock genes to identify putative loss-of-function (Clock

resultsClock

conclusionsLoss of timekeeping fidelity promotes tumour progression and influences clinical outcomes. Clock

Indexed as

CarcinogenesisCircadian ClocksDisease ProgressionGain of Function MutationHomeostasisHumansLoss of Function MutationMultivariate AnalysisPhenotypePrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsRegression AnalysisSignal TransductionTime FactorsTranscriptomeTumor HypoxiaCircadian clockGain-of-functionGliomaHypoxiaLoss-of-functionOncogenePan-cancerRenal cancerTumour suppressor

Identifiers

PMID31014368
PMCPMC6480786
OpenAlexW2916575350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.