Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31014339›Full record

ArticleBiomedical engineering online2019

Cardiac monitoring of dogs via smartphone mechanocardiography: a feasibility study.

Olli Lahdenoja, Tero Hurnanen, Matti Kaisti, Juho Koskinen, Jarno Tuominen, Matti Vähä-Heikkilä, Laura Parikka, Maria Wiberg, Tero Koivisto, Mikko Pänkäälä

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid EAB-277Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Olli LahdenojaDepartment of Future Technologies, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Turku, Vesilinnantie 5, 20014, Turku, Finland. olanla@utu.fi.
Tero HurnanenDepartment of Future Technologies, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Turku, Vesilinnantie 5, 20014, Turku, Finland.
Matti KaistiDepartment of Future Technologies, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Turku, Vesilinnantie 5, 20014, Turku, Finland.
Juho KoskinenDepartment of Future Technologies, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Turku, Vesilinnantie 5, 20014, Turku, Finland.
Jarno TuominenDepartment of Future Technologies, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Turku, Vesilinnantie 5, 20014, Turku, Finland.
Matti Vähä-HeikkiläDepartment of Future Technologies, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Turku, Vesilinnantie 5, 20014, Turku, Finland.
Laura ParikkaDepartment of Equine and Small Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, PL 57 Koetilantie 2, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.
Maria WibergDepartment of Equine and Small Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, PL 57 Koetilantie 2, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.
Tero KoivistoDepartment of Future Technologies, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Turku, Vesilinnantie 5, 20014, Turku, Finland.
Mikko PänkääläDepartment of Future Technologies, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Turku, Vesilinnantie 5, 20014, Turku, Finland.

Funding

Tekes 4228/31/2015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the context of monitoring dogs, usually, accelerometers have been used to measure the dog's movement activity. Here, we study another application of the accelerometers (and gyroscopes)-seismocardiography (SCG) and gyrocardiography (GCG)-to monitor the dog's heart. Together, 3-axis SCG and 3-axis GCG constitute of 6-axis mechanocardiography (MCG), which is inbuilt to most modern smartphones. Thus, the objective of this study is to assess the feasibility of using a smartphone-only solution to studying dog's heart.

methodsA clinical trial (CT) was conducted at the University Small Animal Hospital, University of Helsinki, Finland. 14 dogs (3 breeds) including 18 measurements (about one half of all) where the dog's status was such that it was still and not panting were further selected for the heart rate (HR) analysis (each signal with a duration of 1 min). The measurement device in the CT was a custom Holter monitor including synchronized 6-axis MCG and ECG. In addition, 16 dogs (9 breeds, one mixed-breed) were measured at home settings by the dog owners themselves using Sony Xperia Android smartphone sensor to further validate the applicability of the method.

resultsThe developed algorithm was able to select 10 good-quality signals from the 18 CT measurements, and for 7 of these, the automated algorithm was able to detect HR with deviation below or equal to 5 bpm (compared to ECG). Further visual analysis verified that, for approximately half of the dogs, the signal quality at home environment was sufficient for HR extraction at least in some signal locations, while the motion artifacts due to dog's movements are the main challenges of the method.

conclusionWith improved data analysis techniques for managing noisy measurements, the proposed approach could be useful in home use. The advantage of the method is that it can operate as a stand-alone application without requiring any extra equipment (such as smart collar or ECG patch).

Indexed as

Mechanical PhenomenaSmartphoneAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaDogsFeasibility StudiesHeartMonitoring, PhysiologicSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedDogECGElectrocardiographyGCGGyrocardiographyMCGMechanocardiographySCGSeismocardiographySmartphone

Identifiers

PMID31014339
PMCPMC6480821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.