Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31014222›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2019

Silicified cell walls as a defensive trait in diatoms.

Marina Pančić, Rocio Rodriguez Torres, Rodrigo Almeda, Thomas Kiørboe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. A siliceous arms race in pelagic plankton.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Mechanism of branching morphogenesis inspired by diatom silica formation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Eco-physiological response ofJournal of plankton research
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marina PančićCentre for Ocean Life, Technical University of Denmark, DTU Aqua , Kemitorvet B201, Kongens Lyngby 2800 , Denmark.
Rocio Rodriguez TorresCentre for Ocean Life, Technical University of Denmark, DTU Aqua , Kemitorvet B201, Kongens Lyngby 2800 , Denmark.
Rodrigo AlmedaCentre for Ocean Life, Technical University of Denmark, DTU Aqua , Kemitorvet B201, Kongens Lyngby 2800 , Denmark.
Thomas KiørboeCentre for Ocean Life, Technical University of Denmark, DTU Aqua , Kemitorvet B201, Kongens Lyngby 2800 , Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diatoms contribute nearly half of the marine primary production. These microalgae differ from other phytoplankton groups in having a silicified cell wall, which is the strongest known biological material relative to its density. While it has been suggested that a siliceous wall may have evolved as a mechanical protection against grazing, empirical evidence of its defensive role is limited. Here, we experimentally demonstrate that grazing by adult copepods and nauplii on diatoms is approximately inversely proportional to their silica content, both within and among diatom species. While a sixfold increase in silica content leads to a fourfold decrease in copepod grazing, silicification provides no protection against protozoan grazers that directly engulf their prey. We also found that the wall provides limited protection to cells ingested by copepods, since less than 1% of consumed cells were alive in the faecal pellets. Moreover, silica deposition in diatoms decreases with increasing growth rates, suggesting a possible cost of defence. Overall, our results demonstrate that thickening of silica walls is an effective defence strategy against copepods. This suggests that the plasticity of silicification in diatoms may have evolved as a response to copepod grazing pressure, whose specialized tools to break silicified walls have coevolved with diatoms.

Indexed as

Food ChainHerbivoryAnimalsCell WallCopepodaDiatomsPhytoplanktonSilicon DioxideSilicon Dioxidediatomsmechanical defencesilica walltraits and trade-offszooplankton grazing

Identifiers

PMID31014222
PMCPMC6501939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.